Re: [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5 (resend)

2007-09-13 Thread Mel Gorman
On (12/09/07 16:27), Lee Schermerhorn didst pronounce: > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 22:30 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > (Sorry for the resend, I mucked up the TO: line in the earlier sending) > > > > This is the latest version of one-zonelist and it should be solid enough > > for wider testing. To

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5 (resend)

2007-09-13 Thread Mel Gorman
On (12/09/07 16:27), Lee Schermerhorn didst pronounce: On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 22:30 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: (Sorry for the resend, I mucked up the TO: line in the earlier sending) This is the latest version of one-zonelist and it should be solid enough for wider testing. To briefly

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5 (resend)

2007-09-12 Thread Lee Schermerhorn
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 22:30 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > (Sorry for the resend, I mucked up the TO: line in the earlier sending) > > This is the latest version of one-zonelist and it should be solid enough > for wider testing. To briefly summarise, the patchset replaces multiple >

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5 (resend)

2007-09-12 Thread Lee Schermerhorn
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 22:30 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: (Sorry for the resend, I mucked up the TO: line in the earlier sending) This is the latest version of one-zonelist and it should be solid enough for wider testing. To briefly summarise, the patchset replaces multiple zonelists-per-node

[PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5 (resend)

2007-09-11 Thread Mel Gorman
(Sorry for the resend, I mucked up the TO: line in the earlier sending) This is the latest version of one-zonelist and it should be solid enough for wider testing. To briefly summarise, the patchset replaces multiple zonelists-per-node with one zonelist that is filtered based on nodemask and GFP

[PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5

2007-09-11 Thread Mel Gorman
This is the latest version of one-zonelist and it should be solid enough for wider testing. To briefly summarise, the patchset replaces multiple zonelists-per-node with one zonelist that is filtered based on nodemask and GFP flags. I've dropped the patch that replaces inline functions with macros

[PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5

2007-09-11 Thread Mel Gorman
This is the latest version of one-zonelist and it should be solid enough for wider testing. To briefly summarise, the patchset replaces multiple zonelists-per-node with one zonelist that is filtered based on nodemask and GFP flags. I've dropped the patch that replaces inline functions with macros

[PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5 (resend)

2007-09-11 Thread Mel Gorman
(Sorry for the resend, I mucked up the TO: line in the earlier sending) This is the latest version of one-zonelist and it should be solid enough for wider testing. To briefly summarise, the patchset replaces multiple zonelists-per-node with one zonelist that is filtered based on nodemask and GFP

[PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5

2007-08-31 Thread Mel Gorman
The main changes here is a changeover to -mm and the dropping of gfp_skip until it has been of proven performance benefit to scanning. The -mm switch is not straight-forward as they collide heavily with the memoryless patches. This set has the memoryless patches as a pre-requisite for smooth

[PATCH 0/6] Use one zonelist per node instead of multiple zonelists v5

2007-08-31 Thread Mel Gorman
The main changes here is a changeover to -mm and the dropping of gfp_skip until it has been of proven performance benefit to scanning. The -mm switch is not straight-forward as they collide heavily with the memoryless patches. This set has the memoryless patches as a pre-requisite for smooth