On 05/26/2014 09:24 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Preeti,
>
> I have done ebizzy tests on my platforms but doesn't have similar
> results than you (my results below). It seems to be linked to SMT. I'm
> going to look at that part more deeply and try to find a more suitable
> HW for tests.
You
Hi Preeti,
I have done ebizzy tests on my platforms but doesn't have similar
results than you (my results below). It seems to be linked to SMT. I'm
going to look at that part more deeply and try to find a more suitable
HW for tests.
ebizzy -t N -S 20
Quad cores
N tip +patchset
On 26 May 2014 11:44, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> I conducted test runs of ebizzy on a Power8 box which had 48 cpus.
> 6 cores with SMT-8 to be precise. Its a single socket box. The results
> are as below.
>
> On 05/23/2014 09:22 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Part of this patchset
Hi Vincent,
I conducted test runs of ebizzy on a Power8 box which had 48 cpus.
6 cores with SMT-8 to be precise. Its a single socket box. The results
are as below.
On 05/23/2014 09:22 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Part of this patchset was previously part of the larger tasks packing patchset
>
Hi Vincent,
I conducted test runs of ebizzy on a Power8 box which had 48 cpus.
6 cores with SMT-8 to be precise. Its a single socket box. The results
are as below.
On 05/23/2014 09:22 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Part of this patchset was previously part of the larger tasks packing patchset
[1].
On 26 May 2014 11:44, Preeti U Murthy pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Vincent,
I conducted test runs of ebizzy on a Power8 box which had 48 cpus.
6 cores with SMT-8 to be precise. Its a single socket box. The results
are as below.
On 05/23/2014 09:22 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Part of
Hi Preeti,
I have done ebizzy tests on my platforms but doesn't have similar
results than you (my results below). It seems to be linked to SMT. I'm
going to look at that part more deeply and try to find a more suitable
HW for tests.
ebizzy -t N -S 20
Quad cores
N tip +patchset
On 05/26/2014 09:24 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Hi Preeti,
I have done ebizzy tests on my platforms but doesn't have similar
results than you (my results below). It seems to be linked to SMT. I'm
going to look at that part more deeply and try to find a more suitable
HW for tests.
You are
Part of this patchset was previously part of the larger tasks packing patchset
[1]. I have splitted the latter in 3 different patchsets (at least) to make the
thing easier.
-configuration of sched_domain topology [2]
-update and consolidation of cpu_power (this patchset)
-tasks packing algorithm
Part of this patchset was previously part of the larger tasks packing patchset
[1]. I have splitted the latter in 3 different patchsets (at least) to make the
thing easier.
-configuration of sched_domain topology [2]
-update and consolidation of cpu_power (this patchset)
-tasks packing algorithm
10 matches
Mail list logo
