On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, devices can be unbound from the
> > driver via sysfs, so we should not be using __exit annotations on
> > remove() methods. The only exception is drivers registered with
> > platform_driver_probe() which
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, devices can be unbound from the
> > driver via sysfs, so we should not be using __exit annotations on
> > remove() methods. The only exception is drivers registered with
> > platform_driver_probe() which
On Wednesday, March 01, 2017 03:31:09 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, devices can be unbound from the
> driver via sysfs, so we should not be using __exit annotations on
> remove() methods. The only exception is drivers registered with
> platform_driver_probe() which
On Wednesday, March 01, 2017 03:31:09 PM Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Even if bus is not hot-pluggable, devices can be unbound from the
> driver via sysfs, so we should not be using __exit annotations on
> remove() methods. The only exception is drivers registered with
> platform_driver_probe() which
4 matches
Mail list logo