Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

On 05/24/2017 11:39 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: I've only looked on the last 2 patches. You can add my: Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov if you want. :-) Will do. For the series, or just for 5/5? 5/5 only. :-) MBR, Sergei

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

On 05/24/2017 11:39 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: I've only looked on the last 2 patches. You can add my: Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov if you want. :-) Will do. For the series, or just for 5/5? 5/5 only. :-) MBR, Sergei

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Sergei Shtylyov >I've only looked on the last 2 patches. You can add my: > > Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov > > if you want. :-) Will do. For the series, or just for 5/5?

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Sergei Shtylyov >I've only looked on the last 2 patches. You can add my: > > Reviewed-by: Sergei Shtylyov > > if you want. :-) Will do. For the series, or just for 5/5?

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

On 05/24/2017 02:34 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: I'm shocked this somehow made it into the commit. I wonder how that happened? Sorry for not noticing this when it first appeared. Anyway, fixed in my git repo, and will be part of the next series. (Unless DaveM wants to fix it up

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

On 05/24/2017 02:34 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: I'm shocked this somehow made it into the commit. I wonder how that happened? Sorry for not noticing this when it first appeared. Anyway, fixed in my git repo, and will be part of the next series. (Unless DaveM wants to fix it up

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

I'm shocked this somehow made it into the commit. I wonder how that happened? Anyway, fixed in my git repo, and will be part of the next series. (Unless DaveM wants to fix it up trivially when/if he merges this v9, which would be faster.) Barring that, does this look good to you? Could I have

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

I'm shocked this somehow made it into the commit. I wonder how that happened? Anyway, fixed in my git repo, and will be part of the next series. (Unless DaveM wants to fix it up trivially when/if he merges this v9, which would be faster.) Barring that, does this look good to you? Could I have

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

Hello! On 5/23/2017 7:05 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Jason Wang --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH net-next v9 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always

Hello! On 5/23/2017 7:05 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Jason Wang --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 9 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c