Hi Christoph,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:00:22 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Please just drop the branch for now.
I will revert those 4 commits from today's linux-next and all Al needs
to do is reset his for-next branch to its parent.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgptop3INTvLv.pgp
Ok, looks like my baseline had arm64 defconfig fail due to a missing
include already, so the script didn't see a regression due to the
existing failure in ptrauth_keys_init_user.
Looks like moving the definіtion to asm-generic/compat.h is a better
idea better anyway.
Please just drop the branch for now.
Hi,
在 2020/7/31 16:30, Naresh Kamboju 写道:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 09:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:46:52 +0800 Shaokun Zhang
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There's a build failure on arm64:
>>>
>>> In file included from ./include/linux/compat.h:17:0,
>>>
Hi Naresh,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:00:57 +0530 Naresh Kamboju
wrote:
>
> > Presumably caused by commit
> >
> > b902bfb3f0e9 ("arm64: stop using directly")
>
> I have reverted this commit
> b902bfb3f0e9 ("arm64: stop using directly")
>
> and rebuilt arm64 failed due to below
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 09:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:46:52 +0800 Shaokun Zhang
> wrote:
> >
> > There's a build failure on arm64:
> >
> > In file included from ./include/linux/compat.h:17:0,
> > from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:13,
>
Hi all,
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 10:46:52 +0800 Shaokun Zhang
wrote:
>
> There's a build failure on arm64:
>
> In file included from ./include/linux/compat.h:17:0,
> from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:13,
> from ./include/linux/stat.h:6,
> from
Hi,
There's a build failure on arm64:
In file included from ./include/linux/compat.h:17:0,
from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/stat.h:13,
from ./include/linux/stat.h:6,
from ./include/linux/sysfs.h:22,
from
Hi all,
Changes since 20200729:
My fixes tree contains:
dbf24e30ce2e ("device_cgroup: Fix RCU list debugging warning")
Linus' tree gained a build failure for which I revertd a commit.
The vfs tree lost its build failure.
The printk tree lost its build failure.
The net-next tree lost its
On 7/29/19 10:15 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190729:
>
on i386:
../drivers/net/phy/mdio-octeon.c: In function ‘octeon_mdiobus_probe’:
../drivers/net/phy/mdio-octeon.c:48:3: warning: cast from pointer to integer of
different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
Hi all,
Changes since 20190729:
New tree: fsverity
The keys tree gained a semantic conflict against the fsverity tree for
which I applied a merge fix patch.
Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2756
3095 files changed, 191869 insertions(+), 78406 deletions(-)
Hi all,
Changes since 20180727:
Undropped tree: kspp
The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure.
The net-next tree lost its build failure.
The crypto tree gained a conflict against the net-mext tree.
The devicetree tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree.
The xen-tip tree gained a
Hi all,
Changes since 20180727:
Undropped tree: kspp
The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure.
The net-next tree lost its build failure.
The crypto tree gained a conflict against the net-mext tree.
The devicetree tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree.
The xen-tip tree gained a
Hi all,
Changes since 20150729:
The nfsd tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The drm-misc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The block tree gained conflicts against the ext3 and f2fs trees and a
build failure for which
Hi all,
Changes since 20150729:
The nfsd tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
The drm-misc tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
The block tree gained conflicts against the ext3 and f2fs trees and a
build failure for which
Hi all,
Changes since 20140729:
The net tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20140729.
The pm tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
The modules tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20140725.
The mmc-uh tree still had its build
Hi all,
Changes since 20140729:
The net tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
next-20140729.
The pm tree gained a conflict against the arm-soc tree.
The modules tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20140725.
The mmc-uh tree still had its build
Hi all,
Changes since 20130729:
The ext4 tree still has its build failure so I used the version from
next-20130726.
The next-next tree lost its build failure but gained another for which I
reverted a commit.
The spi tree lost its build failure.
The usb-gadget tree gained a conflict against
Hi all,
Changes since 20130729:
The ext4 tree still has its build failure so I used the version from
next-20130726.
The next-next tree lost its build failure but gained another for which I
reverted a commit.
The spi tree lost its build failure.
The usb-gadget tree gained a conflict against
19 matches
Mail list logo
