On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:34:01PM +0200, Antti Palosaari wrote:
On 02/03/2015 07:53 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
If latter a better way to lock the I2C mux appears, we can reverse
this change.
More I am worried about next patch in a serie, which converts all that to
regmap API... Same
On 02/03/2015 07:53 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Mon, 02 Feb 2015 21:33:24 +0100
Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de escreveu:
Ok, this may eventually work ok for now, but a further change at the I2C
core could easily break it. So, we need to double check about such
patch with the I2C
Em Mon, 02 Feb 2015 21:33:24 +0100
Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de escreveu:
Ok, this may eventually work ok for now, but a further change at the I2C
core could easily break it. So, we need to double check about such
patch with the I2C maintainer.
Jean,
Are you ok with such
On 02/02/2015 09:33 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Ok, this may eventually work ok for now, but a further change at the I2C
core could easily break it. So, we need to double check about such
patch with the I2C maintainer.
Jean,
Are you ok with such patch? If so, please ack.
Jean handed over I2C
Em Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:49:14 +0200
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Own I2C locking is needed due to two special reasons:
1) Chips uses multiple register pages/banks on single I2C slave.
Page is changed via I2C register access.
2) Chip offers muxed/gated I2C adapter for tuner. Gate/mux
On 02/02/2015 10:56 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Mauro, Antti,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:07:26 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:49:14 +0200
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Own I2C locking is needed due to two special reasons:
1) Chips uses multiple register
On 02/02/2015 10:07 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:49:14 +0200
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Own I2C locking is needed due to two special reasons:
1) Chips uses multiple register pages/banks on single I2C slave.
Page is changed via I2C register access.
2) Chip
Ok, this may eventually work ok for now, but a further change at the I2C
core could easily break it. So, we need to double check about such
patch with the I2C maintainer.
Jean,
Are you ok with such patch? If so, please ack.
Jean handed over I2C to me in late 2012 :)
Basic problem here
Hi Mauro, Antti,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:07:26 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Tue, 23 Dec 2014 22:49:14 +0200
Antti Palosaari cr...@iki.fi escreveu:
Own I2C locking is needed due to two special reasons:
1) Chips uses multiple register pages/banks on single I2C slave.
Page is
Own I2C locking is needed due to two special reasons:
1) Chips uses multiple register pages/banks on single I2C slave.
Page is changed via I2C register access.
2) Chip offers muxed/gated I2C adapter for tuner. Gate/mux is
controlled by I2C register access.
Due to these reasons, I2C locking did
10 matches
Mail list logo
