Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] [media] dvb-frontends/stv0367: add flag to make i2c_gatectrl optional

2017-03-27 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
Am 26.03.2017 um 12:34 schrieb Daniel Scheller: > Am Sun, 26 Mar 2017 10:03:33 +0200 > schrieb Matthias Schwarzott : > >> Am 24.03.2017 um 19:23 schrieb Daniel Scheller: >>> From: Daniel Scheller >>> >>> Some hardware and bridges (namely ddbridge) require

Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] [media] dvb-frontends/stv0367: add flag to make i2c_gatectrl optional

2017-03-26 Thread Daniel Scheller
Am Sun, 26 Mar 2017 10:03:33 +0200 schrieb Matthias Schwarzott : > Am 24.03.2017 um 19:23 schrieb Daniel Scheller: > > From: Daniel Scheller > > > > Some hardware and bridges (namely ddbridge) require that tuner > > access is limited to one concurrent access

Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] [media] dvb-frontends/stv0367: add flag to make i2c_gatectrl optional

2017-03-26 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
Am 24.03.2017 um 19:23 schrieb Daniel Scheller: > From: Daniel Scheller > > Some hardware and bridges (namely ddbridge) require that tuner access is > limited to one concurrent access and wrap i2c gate control with a > mutex_lock when attaching frontends. According to vendor

[PATCH v2 01/12] [media] dvb-frontends/stv0367: add flag to make i2c_gatectrl optional

2017-03-24 Thread Daniel Scheller
From: Daniel Scheller Some hardware and bridges (namely ddbridge) require that tuner access is limited to one concurrent access and wrap i2c gate control with a mutex_lock when attaching frontends. According to vendor information, this is required as concurrent tuner