Port and endpoint numbering has been omitted in DT binding documentation for a large number of devices. Also common properties the device uses have been missed in binding documentation. Make it explicit that these things need to be documented.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com> --- .../devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt index 852041a..3c5382f 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/video-interfaces.txt @@ -55,6 +55,21 @@ divided into two separate ITU-R BT.656 8-bit busses. In such case bus-width and data-shift properties can be used to assign physical data lines to each endpoint node (logical bus). +Documenting bindings for devices +-------------------------------- + +All required and optional bindings the device supports shall be explicitly +documented in device DT binding documentation. This also includes port and +endpoint numbering for the device. + +Port and endpoint numbering +--------------------------- + +Old binding documentation may have omitted explicitly specifying port and +endpoint numbers. This often applies to devices that have a single port and a +single endpoint in that port. In this case, the only valid port number for such +a device is zero. The same applies for devices for which bindings do not +document endpoint numbering: only zero is a valid endpoint. Required properties ------------------- -- 2.7.4
