On 13/04/17 12:12, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Is there anything else CEC needs to access or control (besides the CEC
>> IP itself)?
>
> The CEC framework needs to be informed about the physical address contained
> in the EDID (part of the CEA-861 block). And when the HPD goes down it needs
> to be
On 04/13/2017 10:43 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 12/04/17 17:04, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>>> So is some other driver supporting this already? Or is the omap4 the
>>> first platform you're trying this on?
>>
>> No, there are quite a few CEC drivers by now, but typically the CEC block is
>> a
On 12/04/17 17:04, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> So is some other driver supporting this already? Or is the omap4 the
>> first platform you're trying this on?
>
> No, there are quite a few CEC drivers by now, but typically the CEC block is
> a totally independent IP block with its own power, irq, etc.
On 04/12/2017 03:21 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 12/04/17 16:03, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>> I noticed while experimenting with this that tpd_disconnect() in
>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/encoder-tpd12s015.c isn't called when
>> I disconnect the HDMI cable. Is that a bug somewhere?
>>
>> I
On 12/04/17 16:03, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> I noticed while experimenting with this that tpd_disconnect() in
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/encoder-tpd12s015.c isn't called when
> I disconnect the HDMI cable. Is that a bug somewhere?
>
> I would expect that tpd_connect and tpd_disconnect are
On 04/12/2017 03:03 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> On 04/10/2017 01:59 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 08/04/17 13:11, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>
>>> So, this is a bit of a blast from the past since the omap4 CEC development
>>> has been on hold for almost a year. But I am about to resume my
Hi Tomi,
On 04/10/2017 01:59 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 08/04/17 13:11, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
>> So, this is a bit of a blast from the past since the omap4 CEC development
>> has been on hold for almost a year. But I am about to resume my work on this
>> now that the CEC framework was
On 08/04/17 13:11, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> So, this is a bit of a blast from the past since the omap4 CEC development
> has been on hold for almost a year. But I am about to resume my work on this
> now that the CEC framework was merged.
>
> The latest code is here, if you are interested:
>
>
On 04/08/2017 12:11 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> On 05/10/2016 01:36 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> On 29/04/16 12:39, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> From: Hans Verkuil
>>>
>>> As long as there is a valid physical address in the EDID and the omap
>>> CEC
Hi Tomi,
On 05/10/2016 01:36 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On 29/04/16 12:39, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> From: Hans Verkuil
>>
>> As long as there is a valid physical address in the EDID and the omap
>> CEC support is enabled, then we keep ls_oe_gpio on to ensure
Hi Hans,
On 29/04/16 12:39, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> From: Hans Verkuil
>
> As long as there is a valid physical address in the EDID and the omap
> CEC support is enabled, then we keep ls_oe_gpio on to ensure the CEC
> signal is passed through the tpd12s015.
>
>
From: Hans Verkuil
As long as there is a valid physical address in the EDID and the omap
CEC support is enabled, then we keep ls_oe_gpio on to ensure the CEC
signal is passed through the tpd12s015.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil
Suggested-by: Tomi
12 matches
Mail list logo