On 02/24/2015 10:29 AM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
This patch addresses a regression introduced in the following patch:
commit 5264a522a597032c009f9143686ebf0fa4e244fb
Author: Shuah Khan shua...@osg.samsung.com
Date: Mon Sep 22 21:30:46 2014 -0300
[media] media: tuner xc5000 - release
I would request you to add a comment here indicating the
hybrid case scenario to avoid any future cleanup type work
deciding there is no need to set priv-firmware to null
since priv gets released in hybrid_tuner_release_state(priv);
No, I'm not going to rebase my tree and regenerate the patch
On 02/25/2015 07:56 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
I would request you to add a comment here indicating the
hybrid case scenario to avoid any future cleanup type work
deciding there is no need to set priv-firmware to null
since priv gets released in hybrid_tuner_release_state(priv);
No, I'm not
These are just the issues I would like to implement drivers as standard I2C
driver model =) Attaching driver for one chip twice is ugly hack!
While I'm not arguing the merits of using the standard I2C driver
model, it won't actually help in this case since we would still need a
structure
Em Wed, 25 Feb 2015 13:37:07 -0500
Devin Heitmueller dheitmuel...@kernellabs.com escreveu:
These are just the issues I would like to implement drivers as standard I2C
driver model =) Attaching driver for one chip twice is ugly hack!
While I'm not arguing the merits of using the standard
