Hi,
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:32:10PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:24:26AM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:47:16PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > None of the flash operations are not mandatory and therefore there should
> > > be no need
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:24:26AM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:47:16PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > None of the flash operations are not mandatory and therefore there should
> > be no need for the flash ops structure either. Accept NULL.
>
> I think you
Hi Sakari,
On 06/14/2017 11:19 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:14:13PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Sakari,
>>
>> On 06/14/2017 11:47 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> None of the flash operations are not mandatory and therefore there should
>>> be no need
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:47:16PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> None of the flash operations are not mandatory and therefore there should
> be no need for the flash ops structure either. Accept NULL.
I think you negated one time too much :). Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel
Hi Jacek,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:14:13PM +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On 06/14/2017 11:47 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > None of the flash operations are not mandatory and therefore there should
> > be no need for the flash ops structure either. Accept NULL.
> >
> >
Hi Sakari,
On 06/14/2017 11:47 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> None of the flash operations are not mandatory and therefore there should
> be no need for the flash ops structure either. Accept NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus
> ---
>