On Monday, October 06, 2014 10:28:46 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> No users of pm_power_off are left, so it is safe to remove the function.
>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Cc: Pavel Machek
> Cc: Len Brown
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
ACK
> ---
> include/linux/pm.h | 1 -
> kernel/po
On Monday, October 06, 2014 10:28:05 PM Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Poweroff handlers may now be installed with register_poweroff_handler.
> Use the new API function have_kernel_poweroff to determine if a poweroff
> handler has been installed.
>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Cc: Pavel Machek
> Cc: Len Br
On 10/07/14 11:59, David Daney wrote:
> On 10/07/2014 09:31 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:21:11AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>>> On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent
and should thus not describe
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 05:21:11PM +0100, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent
> > and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented
> > in Linux.
>
> So your argument is that lin
On 10/07/2014 09:31 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:21:11AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent
and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented
in Linux
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:21:11AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent
> > and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented
> > in Linux.
>
> So your argument is that lin
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:28:31PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> directly. Register with default priority value of 128 since we don't know
> any better.
>
> Cc: Julian Andres Klode
> Cc: Marc Dietrich
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartma
On 10/07/14 00:28, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent
> and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented
> in Linux.
So your argument is that linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings should
not be specific to Linux. Mer
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:28:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of seting pm_power_off
> directly. Register as poweroff handler of last resort since the driver
> does not really power off the system but executes a restart.
I would not say last resort
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:28:25PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> directly. Register with default priority value of 128 to reflect that
> the original code generates an error if another poweroff handler has
> already been regist
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:28:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> directly. Register with a low priority value of 64 to reflect that
> the original code only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.
>
> Other changes:
>
>
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 12:02:19PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 06:28:09AM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Replace reference to pm_power_off (which is an implementation detail)
> > and replace it with a more generic description of the driver's
> > functionality.
> >
> > Cc
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:28:09PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Replace reference to pm_power_off (which is an implementation detail)
> and replace it with a more generic description of the driver's functionality.
Acked-by: Andrew Lunn
Thanks
Andrew
>
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: Pawel Mo
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:28:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> pm_power_off is an implementation detail. Replace it with a more generic
> description of the driver's functionality.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: Pawel Moll
> Cc: Mark Rutland
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
Acked-by: Andrew Lunn
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 06:28:08AM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> pm_power_off is an implementation detail. Replace it with a more generic
> description of the driver's functionality.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: Pawel Moll
> Cc: Mark Rutland
Acked-by: Mark Rutland
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 06:28:09AM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Replace reference to pm_power_off (which is an implementation detail)
> and replace it with a more generic description of the driver's functionality.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: Pawel Moll
> Cc: Mark Rutland
> Signed-off-by: Guenter
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 06:28:07AM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Devicetree bindings are supposed to be operating system independent
> and should thus not describe how a specific functionality is implemented
> in Linux.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring
> Cc: Pawel Moll
> Cc: Mark Rutland
> Signed-off-by: Gu
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> directly.
>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven
> Cc: Joshua Thompson
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
As someone already mentioned, having #defines instead of hardcoded
numbers fo
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Replace mach_power_off with pm_power_off to simplify the subsequent
> move of pm_power_off to generic code.
Thanks!
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven
> Cc: Greg Ungerer
> Cc: Joshua Thompson
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
Looks OK, so since you
On 07/10/2014 07:28, Guenter Roeck :
> Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> directly. Always use register_poweroff_handler_simple as there is no
> indication that more than one poweroff handler is registered.
>
> If the poweroff handler only resets the system or
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> directly. Register with a low priority value of 64 to reflect that
> the original code only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij
> Cc: Lee Jones
> Cc
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> directly. Register with a low priority value of 64 to reflect that
> the original code only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.
>
> Make twl4030_power_off static as it is o
Hello
This seems exactly what I would need on the mc13783 to handle cleanly
the poweroff,
but after reading this patchset I have the following question:
[...]
+/*
+ * Notifier list for kernel code which wants to be called
+ * to power off the system.
+ */
+static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD
23 matches
Mail list logo
