Re: [PATCH v3] MMC/SDIO: enable SDIO device to suspend/resume asynchronously

2015-11-26 Thread Fu, Zhonghui
On 11/23/2015 11:26 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 17 November 2015 at 14:48, Fu, Zhonghui > wrote: >> >> On 11/16/2015 7:30 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On 15 November 2015 at 14:53, Fu, Zhonghui >>> wrote: Now, PM core supports

Re: [PATCH v3] MMC/SDIO: enable SDIO device to suspend/resume asynchronously

2015-11-26 Thread Ulf Hansson
[...] >> >> Depending if you have SD/(e)MMC card slot(s), the below patch might >> affect your results. So it might be a good idea to re-run your test to >> get some fresh data. >> >> [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: Make runtime resume default behavior for MMC/SD [3] > I didn't find this patch in mainline

Re: [PATCH v3] MMC/SDIO: enable SDIO device to suspend/resume asynchronously

2015-11-22 Thread Fu, Zhonghui
On 11/17/2015 9:48 PM, Fu, Zhonghui wrote: > > On 11/16/2015 7:30 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 15 November 2015 at 14:53, Fu, Zhonghui >> wrote: >>> Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices >>> during system suspend/resume, and the power

Re: [PATCH v3] MMC/SDIO: enable SDIO device to suspend/resume asynchronously

2015-11-17 Thread Fu, Zhonghui
On 11/16/2015 7:30 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 15 November 2015 at 14:53, Fu, Zhonghui > wrote: >> Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices >> during system suspend/resume, and the power state transition of one >> device may be completed

Re: [PATCH v3] MMC/SDIO: enable SDIO device to suspend/resume asynchronously

2015-11-16 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 15 November 2015 at 14:53, Fu, Zhonghui wrote: > Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices > during system suspend/resume, and the power state transition of one > device may be completed in separate kernel thread. PM core ensures > all