On 2014/6/16 16:15, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 16-06-14 07:49, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
From 14485894add32aedacb3e486ebb2cc2b73861abf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu zhonghui zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:06:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] brcmfmac: prevent watchdog from
Hi, all
The mmc_sdio_init_card(drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c) function calls
mmc_alloc_card(drivers/mmc/core/bus.c) function to allocate a card structure.
card-dev.bus is assigned with mmc_bus_type in mmc_alloc_card function. Why not
assign sdio_bus_type to card-dev.bus?
struct mmc_card
Hi, all
The statement mmc-caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD; is added in
sdhci_add_host function in host/sdhci.c file. In some cases, this will make
host-sdio_irq_thread a NULL pointer in mmc_sdio_resume functon of
core/sdio.c file and lead to resume failure. Could you please give me some
,
Jaehoon Chung
On 07/04/2014 12:47 AM, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Hi, all
The statement mmc-caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD; is added in
sdhci_add_host function in host/sdhci.c file. In some cases, this will
make host-sdio_irq_thread a NULL pointer in mmc_sdio_resume functon of
core/sdio.c file
Hi,
Why add mmc-caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD; ? How to fix this bug?
Could you please give out some idea about this bug?
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2014/7/6 23:19, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Yes, mmc-caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD; of sdhci_add_host function
in host/sdhci.c file make oops
Hi,
The data type of host is struct mmc_host, and there is not quirks member
in this structure.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2014/7/14 21:26, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi Zhonghui,
On Tue, Jul 08 2014, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Why add mmc-caps2 |= MMC_CAP2_SDIO_IRQ_NOTHREAD; ? How to fix this bug?
Could
Hi,
Chris' patch is not enough to fix this bug. I made a patch as follows and
verified it can work. Could you please give out some comments about this patch?
Thanks,
Zhonghui
From 72d6f5b56fa04290fd3a055ade1d89e7c8d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu Zhonghui zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
On 2014/6/20 0:37, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 19-06-14 18:28, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
On 2014/6/16 16:15, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 16-06-14 07:49, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
From 14485894add32aedacb3e486ebb2cc2b73861abf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu zhonghui zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
Date
On 2014/7/21 15:42, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
On 2014/6/20 0:37, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 19-06-14 18:28, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
On 2014/6/16 16:15, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 16-06-14 07:49, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
From 14485894add32aedacb3e486ebb2cc2b73861abf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu
Hi,
Any comments for this new patch?
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2014/7/20 22:51, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Hi,
Chris' patch is not enough to fix this bug. I made a patch as follows and
verified it can work. Could you please give out some comments about this
patch?
Thanks,
Zhonghui
From
On 2014/7/24 23:22, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
On 2014/7/21 15:42, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
On 2014/6/20 0:37, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 19-06-14 18:28, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
On 2014/6/16 16:15, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 16-06-14 07:49, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
From
Hi, Jaehoon
According to your comments, I created a new patch for this issue as follows:
Thanks,
Zhonghui
From 6cee984e1d76ba0a3320430f8cf4318ab65fcf06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu Zhonghui zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:44:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio
On 2014/8/5 0:52, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:36:49AM +0800, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Hi, Arend
I investigated this issue, and its root cause is still that sdio
controller can't receive interrupts from WiFi chip on sdio bus when
sdio controller is in runtime
On 2014/8/5 4:12, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 08/04/14 18:52, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 12:36:49AM +0800, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Hi, Arend
I investigated this issue, and its root cause is still that sdio
controller can't receive interrupts from WiFi chip on sdio
kindly reminder.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2014/8/5 12:56, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Hi, Jaehoon
According to your comments, I created a new patch for this issue as follows:
Thanks,
Zhonghui
From 6cee984e1d76ba0a3320430f8cf4318ab65fcf06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu Zhonghui zhonghui
From 6cee984e1d76ba0a3320430f8cf4318ab65fcf06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu Zhonghui zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:44:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on sdio
thread
781e989cf59 (mmc: sdhci: convert to new SDIO IRQ handling
Hi, everyone
I have posted this new patch in a separate mail. Many thanks for your comments.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2014/8/7 14:58, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
kindly reminder.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2014/8/5 12:56, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Hi, Jaehoon
According to your comments, I created a new patch
From 21266249bbbaf9407c1e88cd5950e06ac88aeebf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu Zhonghui zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:48:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: sdio: Fix unconditional wake_up_process() on sdio
thread
781e989cf59 (mmc: sdhci: convert to new SDIO IRQ
Many thanks for your helps.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2014/8/18 20:07, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 18 August 2014 05:04, Fu, Zhonghui zhonghui...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From 21266249bbbaf9407c1e88cd5950e06ac88aeebf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fu Zhonghui zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
Date: Mon, 18
Hi,Uffe
Could you please tell me into which git repository this patch is merged now?
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2014/8/26 0:10, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Many thanks for your helps.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2014/8/18 20:07, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 18 August 2014 05:04, Fu, Zhonghui zhonghui
On 2015/8/17 14:52, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 17/08/15 06:36, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Hi,
Any comments are welcome.
Same comments as here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=143979428424353w=2
Now, PM core support asynchronous device suspend/resume mode. If one device has
been set
On 2015/8/17 14:51, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 17/08/15 06:38, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Hi,
Any comments are welcome.
Same comments as here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=143979428424353w=2
Now, PM core support asynchronous device suspend/resume mode. If one device has
been set
Hi,
Any comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2015/8/3 21:10, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Enable sdhci-acpi device to suspend/resume asynchronously.
This can improve system suspend/resume speed.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c |2
Hi,
Any comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2015/7/30 15:40, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Enable SDIO card and function device to suspend/resume asynchronously.
This can improve system suspend/resume speed.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c
Hi,
Any comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2015/8/3 20:39, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Enable mmc host device to suspend/resume asynchronously.
This can improve system suspend/resume speed.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/mmc/core/host.c |1 +
1
On 2015/8/17 14:48, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 17/08/15 06:26, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Hi,
Any comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 2015/7/30 15:40, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
Enable SDIO card and function device to suspend/resume asynchronously.
This can improve system suspend/resume speed
Enable mmc host device to suspend/resume asynchronously.
This can improve system suspend/resume speed.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/mmc/core/host.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc
Enable SDIO card and function device to suspend/resume asynchronously.
This can improve system suspend/resume speed.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu zhonghui...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core
Please see the latest version: "[PATCH v3] MMC/SDIO: enable SDIO device to
suspend/resume asynchronously".
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 9/21/2015 12:30 PM, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices
> during system suspend/resume, and
Please review the latest version: "[PATCH v3] mmc: enable mmc host device to
suspend/resume asynchronously"
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 9/21/2015 2:13 PM, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices
> during system suspend/resume, and
On 9/21/2015 4:41 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 21/09/15 11:15, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 21/09/15 08:29, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2015/8/24 15:07, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>>>> On 2015/8/17 14:48, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>>>> On 17/08/15 0
resume
time is reduced from 940ms to 914ms.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Add test result in commit message
drivers/mmc/core/host.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mm
On 9/21/2015 5:32 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 14:51 +0800, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>> Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices
>> during system suspend/resume, and the power state transition of one
>> device may be completed in s
, and
the system resume time is reduced from 940ms to 908ms.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Add test result in commit message
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host
Please review the latest version: "[PATCH v3] mmc/sdhci-acpi: enable sdhci-acpi
device to suspend/resume asynchronously"
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 9/21/2015 2:51 PM, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices
> during syste
On 11/16/2015 7:30 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 15 November 2015 at 14:53, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
>> Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices
>> during system suspend/resume, and the power state transition of one
&g
to suspend/resume asynchronously. This
will take advantage of multicore and improve system suspend/resume
speed.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Amend commit message.
drivers/mmc/core/host.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 del
and function devices to suspend/resume
asynchronously. This will take advantage of multicore and improve
system suspend/resume speed.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Amend commit message.
drivers/mmc/core/sdio.c |4
1 files changed, 4 inse
On 2015/8/24 23:14, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>
> On 2015/8/17 14:51, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 17/08/15 06:38, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Any comments are welcome.
>> Same comments as here:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ker
On 2015/8/27 21:05, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 3 August 2015 at 14:39, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Enable mmc host device to suspend/resume asynchronously.
>> This can improve system suspend/resume speed.
> Can or will?
>
> It would
device to suspend/resume asynchronously.
This will take advantage of multicore and improve system
suspend/resume speed.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Amend commit message.
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions
from
1645ms to 1108ms, and the system resume time is reduced from 940ms
to 918ms.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/mmc/core/bus.c |2 ++
drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c |1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mm
, and the
system resume time is reduced from 940ms to 908ms.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
index f
resume time is reduced from 940ms to 914ms.
Signed-off-by: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/mmc/core/host.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
index da950c4..7222fd7 100644
--- a/drive
On 11/23/2015 11:26 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 17 November 2015 at 14:48, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/16/2015 7:30 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 15 November 2015 at 14:53, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
Any comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 11/16/2015 2:23 PM, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices
> during system suspend/resume, and the power state transition of one
> device may be completed in separate kernel thread. PM cor
On 11/17/2015 9:48 PM, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>
> On 11/16/2015 7:30 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 15 November 2015 at 14:53, Fu, Zhonghui <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices
>>> d
Any comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
On 11/16/2015 12:20 AM, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
> Now, PM core supports asynchronous suspend/resume mode for devices
> during system suspend/resume, and the power state transition of one
> device may be completed in separate kernel thread. PM cor
48 matches
Mail list logo
