On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:17:43 +0100
Paul Crawford wrote:
> On 25/04/16 13:52, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> > That was the "right" thing to do. Or at least justified and discussed.
> > If we want vm86(), we need to re-implement it properly.
> > I have a word from top linux devs
26.04.2016 13:09, Andrew Bird пишет:
The long term goal for the Kernel would be a new simplified vm86() call, but
most likely this is not going to be backwardly compatible for existing apps to
run unchanged.
This is not a problem: there are currently 2 vm86 syscalls:
vm86() and vm86old(). One
26.04.2016 12:17, Paul Crawford пишет:
On 25/04/16 13:52, Stas Sergeev wrote:
That was the "right" thing to do. Or at least justified and discussed.
If we want vm86(), we need to re-implement it properly.
I have a word from top linux devs (including Linus himself)
that properly implemented