On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 01:44:43PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> I regard that the role of this function is to obtain the the segment
> selector from either of the prefixes or inferred from the operands. It
> is the role of caller to determine if the segment selector should be
> ignored.
No, this
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 13:44 -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >
> > > +*/
> > > + for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
> > > + switch (insn->prefixes.bytes[i]) {
> > > + case SEG_CS:
> > > + return SEG_CS;
> > > + case SEG_SS:
> > > +
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 11:42 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:32:39PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > When computing a linear address and segmentation is used, we need to know
> > the base address of the segment involved in the computation. In most of
> > the cases, the
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:32:39PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> When computing a linear address and segmentation is used, we need to know
> the base address of the segment involved in the computation. In most of
> the cases, the segment base address will be zero as in USER_DS/USER32_DS.
> However,
