Re: [newbie] Linux resources online

2000-08-09 Thread Peter

Yes and a little later the floppies had an 8 inch radius and the main time 
spent before a computer was waiting for things to happen.

Glad to know that there are some other fogies around yet.

Regards

Peter 



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs



Re: [newbie] Linux resources online

2000-08-07 Thread cr

On Mon, 07 Aug 2000, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
 I remember working on a machine with 4 k memory; but this was a main-frame
 (IBM 1620) using vacum tubes; input and output by punched cards, and
 running Fortran II; 
 Must have been in '68 or '69.
 
 This was the "obsolete" machine us students were allowed to play with; for
 serious computing, there was another mainframe, with a hard disk of, IIRC,
 4 Mb capacity; memory was 96 kb, raised to 128 kb around 1970.
 
 And we were told we were priviledged, because our university had one of the
 most powerful computers in the education system at the time !
 
 Cheers,
 
 Ron the Frog, getting old on the banks of the Paraguay River.
 

Umm... we just got to make stacks of Fortran punch cards which were collected
and returned a day later with the results, if any.  

First machine I actually programmed was a Olivetti Programma 101, 11 memory
registers, 110 program steps, output printed on paper cash-register tape and
cost thousands.  First program I wrote got into an endless loop and it sat there
spewing tape and wouldn't stop.  Only way I could stop it was to switch it off
at the wall.  I was paranoid that I'd wrecked it (but of course I hadn't).

Chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs



Re: [newbie] Linux resources online

2000-08-07 Thread Joe S. Warren

If memory serves me, the 1620 was a decimal machine that didn't have an
arithmetic unit, add and multiply was performed by trap routines using
table look-up.  My first binary machine was an IBM 7094 w/ 32K of 36-bit
words, 4 256/512 bpi tape drives, a 300 card/minute card reader and a
300 lpm line printer (no disk).  In '64 we upgraded to dual CDC 3600s
with 32K of 48-bit words each and 32K words of shared memory, 8 tape
drives each, 1200 lpm printers and 1200 cpm card readers; still no
disks.  These were the Eastern Missle Test Range's Range Safety
Instantaneous Impact Point computers and there were 2 so that the range
was "Man Rated," supposedly everything had a backup.  All s/w was
assembly language because it took 4 u-sec to do a floating point add.  I
remember modifying the arithmetic sub-pack used to calculate trig
functions and logs to remove all error returns; these were realtime
routines and if you stopped, you knew you were wrong, if you just got a
wrong answer, you might still be right on the next computation cycle 100
ms later.  I didn't learn a compiler language (Fortran-77) until 1980.

Joe
davidturetsky wrote:
 
 Gee, what memories you bring back!
 
 I learned FORTRAN II on an IBM 1620 Model 1 (no disk drive) at NYU in the
 mid-60s, subsequently upgraded to a Model II with a 5meg drive. I then went
 on to do a lot of programming on an 1130
 
 In 1971 I went to work for a company which made a microprogrammable
 replacement for the IBM 1130 which was much faster. Somehow in IBM's master
 plan, the 1130 had too good a price/performance ratio to improve it further
 since that would put it in competition with models like the 360/44
 
 David
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jim Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: *List Linux-Newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 6:05 PM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux resources online
 
  I was using a 1620 in 1970, and it was transistorized, not tubes.  Had a
  5-meg disk drive (14 inch variety, stacked platters) and punched cards.
  "High speed" output was to punched cards, and if you wanted something you
  could read, you had to run the cards through an accounting machine.  The
  really hot computer at the time was the IBM 1130 (unless you had access to
  one of the 360 variants).  The 1130 had assembler, FORTRAN, COBOL, and
 RPG.
 
  Also had the privelege (?) of using an RCA 301, which had 4k of core
 memory,
  six vacuum-column tape drives, and a 900-line/minute printer at about the
  same time.  The only thing available on it was assembler.
 
  Sure punched a lot of cards on 026 keypunch machines back then. :-)
 
  -jdr-
 
 
  Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
  
   I remember working on a machine with 4 k memory; but this was a
 main-frame
   (IBM 1620) using vacum tubes; input and output by punched cards, and
   running Fortran II;
   Must have been in '68 or '69.
  
   This was the "obsolete" machine us students were allowed to play with;
 for
   serious computing, there was another mainframe, with a hard disk of,
 IIRC,
   4 Mb capacity; memory was 96 kb, raised to 128 kb around 1970.
  
   And we were told we were priviledged, because our university had one of
 the
   most powerful computers in the education system at the time !
  
   Cheers,
  
   Ron the Frog, getting old on the banks of the Paraguay River.
  
Anybody else on this list old enough to remember when the "suits"
didn't run things, and games/software were ported to every single
platform, just because they could/it was neat? Circa '80's with
names like Tandy, Atari, Amiga, etc, etc,... ;-)
   
--
   /\
   DarkLord
   \/
  
   --
  
 Any sufficiently advanced technology
 is indistinguishable from magic.
  -- Arthur C. Clarke
  
 ---  http://personales.conexion.com.py/~rolgiati  ---
  
  
   -
 
  -
  To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
  the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
 
 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs



Re: [newbie] Linux resources online

2000-08-07 Thread davidturetsky

Yes, the 1620 was a decimal machine. Word oriented. We started with machine
language,  then assembler, then the big move to Fortran II, then the huge
5mg hard drive which eliminated having to create object code on punched
cards and resubmitting then to the linker/loader. I believe if you wanted
printed output, you created that output on punched cards and brought them
over to a standalone printer which printed card images

It was the good old days! But not as good and not as old as what you
describe!

David
- Original Message -
From: Joe S. Warren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: *List Linux-Newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux resources online


 If memory serves me, the 1620 was a decimal machine that didn't have an
 arithmetic unit, add and multiply was performed by trap routines using
 table look-up.  My first binary machine was an IBM 7094 w/ 32K of 36-bit
 words, 4 256/512 bpi tape drives, a 300 card/minute card reader and a
 300 lpm line printer (no disk).  In '64 we upgraded to dual CDC 3600s
 with 32K of 48-bit words each and 32K words of shared memory, 8 tape
 drives each, 1200 lpm printers and 1200 cpm card readers; still no
 disks.  These were the Eastern Missle Test Range's Range Safety
 Instantaneous Impact Point computers and there were 2 so that the range
 was "Man Rated," supposedly everything had a backup.  All s/w was
 assembly language because it took 4 u-sec to do a floating point add.  I
 remember modifying the arithmetic sub-pack used to calculate trig
 functions and logs to remove all error returns; these were realtime
 routines and if you stopped, you knew you were wrong, if you just got a
 wrong answer, you might still be right on the next computation cycle 100
 ms later.  I didn't learn a compiler language (Fortran-77) until 1980.

 Joe
 davidturetsky wrote:
 
  Gee, what memories you bring back!
 
  I learned FORTRAN II on an IBM 1620 Model 1 (no disk drive) at NYU in
the
  mid-60s, subsequently upgraded to a Model II with a 5meg drive. I then
went
  on to do a lot of programming on an 1130
 
  In 1971 I went to work for a company which made a microprogrammable
  replacement for the IBM 1130 which was much faster. Somehow in IBM's
master
  plan, the 1130 had too good a price/performance ratio to improve it
further
  since that would put it in competition with models like the 360/44
 
  David
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Jim Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: *List Linux-Newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 6:05 PM
  Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux resources online
 
   I was using a 1620 in 1970, and it was transistorized, not tubes.  Had
a
   5-meg disk drive (14 inch variety, stacked platters) and punched
cards.
   "High speed" output was to punched cards, and if you wanted something
you
   could read, you had to run the cards through an accounting machine.
The
   really hot computer at the time was the IBM 1130 (unless you had
access to
   one of the 360 variants).  The 1130 had assembler, FORTRAN, COBOL, and
  RPG.
  
   Also had the privelege (?) of using an RCA 301, which had 4k of core
  memory,
   six vacuum-column tape drives, and a 900-line/minute printer at about
the
   same time.  The only thing available on it was assembler.
  
   Sure punched a lot of cards on 026 keypunch machines back then. :-)
  
   -jdr-
  
  
   Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
   
I remember working on a machine with 4 k memory; but this was a
  main-frame
(IBM 1620) using vacum tubes; input and output by punched cards, and
running Fortran II;
Must have been in '68 or '69.
   
This was the "obsolete" machine us students were allowed to play
with;
  for
serious computing, there was another mainframe, with a hard disk of,
  IIRC,
4 Mb capacity; memory was 96 kb, raised to 128 kb around 1970.
   
And we were told we were priviledged, because our university had one
of
  the
most powerful computers in the education system at the time !
   
Cheers,
   
Ron the Frog, getting old on the banks of the Paraguay River.
   
 Anybody else on this list old enough to remember when the "suits"
 didn't run things, and games/software were ported to every single
 platform, just because they could/it was neat? Circa '80's with
 names like Tandy, Atari, Amiga, etc, etc,... ;-)

 --
/\

DarkLord
\/
   
--
   
  Any sufficiently advanced technology
  is indistinguishable from magic.
   -- Arthur C. Clarke
   
  ---  http://personales.conexion.com.py/~rolgiati  ---
   
   
-
  
   -
   To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-newbie" in
   th

Re: [newbie] Linux resources online

2000-08-06 Thread Renaud OLGIATI

I remember working on a machine with 4 k memory; but this was a main-frame
(IBM 1620) using vacum tubes; input and output by punched cards, and
running Fortran II; 
Must have been in '68 or '69.

This was the "obsolete" machine us students were allowed to play with; for
serious computing, there was another mainframe, with a hard disk of, IIRC,
4 Mb capacity; memory was 96 kb, raised to 128 kb around 1970.

And we were told we were priviledged, because our university had one of the
most powerful computers in the education system at the time !

Cheers,

Ron the Frog, getting old on the banks of the Paraguay River.

 Anybody else on this list old enough to remember when the "suits"
 didn't run things, and games/software were ported to every single
 platform, just because they could/it was neat? Circa '80's with
 names like Tandy, Atari, Amiga, etc, etc,... ;-)

 --
/\
DarkLord
\/





-- 
 
  Any sufficiently advanced technology
  is indistinguishable from magic.
   -- Arthur C. Clarke
 
  ---  http://personales.conexion.com.py/~rolgiati  ---
 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs



Re: [newbie] Linux resources online

2000-08-06 Thread Jim Reimer

I was using a 1620 in 1970, and it was transistorized, not tubes.  Had a
5-meg disk drive (14 inch variety, stacked platters) and punched cards.
"High speed" output was to punched cards, and if you wanted something you
could read, you had to run the cards through an accounting machine.  The
really hot computer at the time was the IBM 1130 (unless you had access to
one of the 360 variants).  The 1130 had assembler, FORTRAN, COBOL, and RPG.

Also had the privelege (?) of using an RCA 301, which had 4k of core memory,
six vacuum-column tape drives, and a 900-line/minute printer at about the
same time.  The only thing available on it was assembler.

Sure punched a lot of cards on 026 keypunch machines back then. :-)

-jdr-


Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
 
 I remember working on a machine with 4 k memory; but this was a main-frame
 (IBM 1620) using vacum tubes; input and output by punched cards, and
 running Fortran II;
 Must have been in '68 or '69.
 
 This was the "obsolete" machine us students were allowed to play with; for
 serious computing, there was another mainframe, with a hard disk of, IIRC,
 4 Mb capacity; memory was 96 kb, raised to 128 kb around 1970.
 
 And we were told we were priviledged, because our university had one of the
 most powerful computers in the education system at the time !
 
 Cheers,
 
 Ron the Frog, getting old on the banks of the Paraguay River.
 
  Anybody else on this list old enough to remember when the "suits"
  didn't run things, and games/software were ported to every single
  platform, just because they could/it was neat? Circa '80's with
  names like Tandy, Atari, Amiga, etc, etc,... ;-)
 
  --
 /\
 DarkLord
 \/
 
 --
 
   Any sufficiently advanced technology
   is indistinguishable from magic.
-- Arthur C. Clarke
 
   ---  http://personales.conexion.com.py/~rolgiati  ---
 
 
 -

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs



Re: [newbie] Linux resources online

2000-08-06 Thread davidturetsky

Gee, what memories you bring back!

I learned FORTRAN II on an IBM 1620 Model 1 (no disk drive) at NYU in the
mid-60s, subsequently upgraded to a Model II with a 5meg drive. I then went
on to do a lot of programming on an 1130

In 1971 I went to work for a company which made a microprogrammable
replacement for the IBM 1130 which was much faster. Somehow in IBM's master
plan, the 1130 had too good a price/performance ratio to improve it further
since that would put it in competition with models like the 360/44

David

- Original Message -
From: Jim Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: *List Linux-Newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2000 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] Linux resources online


 I was using a 1620 in 1970, and it was transistorized, not tubes.  Had a
 5-meg disk drive (14 inch variety, stacked platters) and punched cards.
 "High speed" output was to punched cards, and if you wanted something you
 could read, you had to run the cards through an accounting machine.  The
 really hot computer at the time was the IBM 1130 (unless you had access to
 one of the 360 variants).  The 1130 had assembler, FORTRAN, COBOL, and
RPG.

 Also had the privelege (?) of using an RCA 301, which had 4k of core
memory,
 six vacuum-column tape drives, and a 900-line/minute printer at about the
 same time.  The only thing available on it was assembler.

 Sure punched a lot of cards on 026 keypunch machines back then. :-)

 -jdr-


 Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
 
  I remember working on a machine with 4 k memory; but this was a
main-frame
  (IBM 1620) using vacum tubes; input and output by punched cards, and
  running Fortran II;
  Must have been in '68 or '69.
 
  This was the "obsolete" machine us students were allowed to play with;
for
  serious computing, there was another mainframe, with a hard disk of,
IIRC,
  4 Mb capacity; memory was 96 kb, raised to 128 kb around 1970.
 
  And we were told we were priviledged, because our university had one of
the
  most powerful computers in the education system at the time !
 
  Cheers,
 
  Ron the Frog, getting old on the banks of the Paraguay River.
 
   Anybody else on this list old enough to remember when the "suits"
   didn't run things, and games/software were ported to every single
   platform, just because they could/it was neat? Circa '80's with
   names like Tandy, Atari, Amiga, etc, etc,... ;-)
  
   --
  /\
  DarkLord
  \/
 
  --
 
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
 -- Arthur C. Clarke
 
---  http://personales.conexion.com.py/~rolgiati  ---
 
 
  -

 -
 To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
 the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs