[patch 2.6.26-mmotm] rtc: rtc-omap footprint shrinkage

2008-07-02 Thread David Brownell
Shrink the runtime footprint of the OMAP1 RTC driver a bunch by removing some old hacks and switching to platform_driver_probe(). Signed-off-by: David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/rtc/rtc-omap.c | 21 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) ---

Re: [PATCH 01/11] Basic cpuidle driver

2008-07-02 Thread Högander Jouni
Hi, General comment on this patch using top posting. There is no irq disabling at all in cpuidle loop now. That might cause problems. If you don't want to add that global irq disable you can still add it to omap3 enter function. Do you think this is not needed? ext Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH 02/11] per/neon and core handling in idle

2008-07-02 Thread Högander Jouni
ext Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patches adds handling of PER/NEON and CORE domain in idle. Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 98 +++--- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.h |6 +-

Re: [PATCH 05/11] scratchpad contents

2008-07-02 Thread Högander Jouni
ext Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch populates the scratchpad Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.h|7 + arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c| 170 +++-

Re: [PATCH 06/11] mpu off state enabled

2008-07-02 Thread Högander Jouni
ext Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch updates the CPUidle code to handle MPU OFF related C states Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c | 19 +++ arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.h |5 + 2 files

[RESEND][PATCH]Separate out 3430 LCD panel support from 2430 file

2008-07-02 Thread iqbal
From: Iqbal Shareef [EMAIL PROTECTED] Separate out 3430 LCD panel support from 2430 SDP. Currently the support for the LCD on 3430SDP is added in the lcd_2430sdp.c file. This patch separates it out to a new file. Signed-off-by: Iqbal Shareef [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: [PATCH 11/11] CORE context save/restore

2008-07-02 Thread Högander Jouni
ext Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch adds the CORE context save/restore routines - save/restores the following 1) PRCM registers 2) INTC context 3) System Control module context 4) Padconf Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

RE: [PATCH 06/11] mpu off state enabled

2008-07-02 Thread Rajendra Nayak
-Original Message- From: Högander Jouni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 5:49 PM To: ext Rajendra Nayak Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] mpu off state enabled ext Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch updates

RE: [PATCH 11/11] CORE context save/restore

2008-07-02 Thread Rajendra Nayak
-Original Message- From: Högander Jouni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 6:06 PM To: ext Rajendra Nayak Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] CORE context save/restore ext Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch adds

[PATCH 1/1] twl4030-madc: Fix arbitrarily initialized function pointer

2008-07-02 Thread Viktor Rosendahl
req is an automatic variable and thus we cannot rely on it being initialized to zero (I am leaving the 0!= NULL discussion aside). Other functions test if this pointer is NULL, in order to determine whether it is a valid address or not. Signed-off-by: Viktor Rosendahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[PATCH 0/1] twl4030-madc: Fix arbitrarily initialized function pointer

2008-07-02 Thread Viktor Rosendahl
Hi all, I have seen this bug crash the kernel when the security framework is enabled in the kernel config. It crashed with a bad syscall from the events/0 workqueue; probably because the security framework is initialized very early and thus the stack has been used more [or differently] and we end

Re: [PATCH 02/11] per/neon and core handling in idle

2008-07-02 Thread Högander Jouni
ext Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -Original Message- From: Högander Jouni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 5:19 PM To: ext Rajendra Nayak Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] per/neon and core handling in idle ext

RE: [PATCH 00/11] OMAP3 CPUidle patches

2008-07-02 Thread Rajendra Nayak
-Original Message- From: Peter 'p2' De Schrijver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 6:41 PM To: ext Rajendra Nayak Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] OMAP3 CPUidle patches Hi Rajendra, On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 07:46:01PM +0530,

Re: [PATCH 11/11] CORE context save/restore

2008-07-02 Thread Högander Jouni
ext Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -Original Message- From: Högander Jouni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 6:06 PM To: ext Rajendra Nayak Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] CORE context save/restore ext Rajendra Nayak

RE: [PATCH 11/11] CORE context save/restore

2008-07-02 Thread Rajendra Nayak
-Original Message- From: Högander Jouni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 7:14 PM To: ext Rajendra Nayak Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] CORE context save/restore ext Rajendra Nayak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Re: [PATCH 00/11] OMAP3 CPUidle patches

2008-07-02 Thread Peter 'p2' De Schrijver
Hi Rajendra, Not sure, but you can try with my .config while I try with yours. I was doing some more testing today, and I saw a hang after a while of idle activity with OFF being attempted multiple times. Using lauterbach showed me it being stuck up in prcm_interrupt_handler trying to

Kernel hang on OMAP3 based Beagle board, RTC issue?

2008-07-02 Thread Dirk Behme
At Beagle IRC there was some discussion [1] [2] today about kernel hang on OMAP3 based Beagle board. I'll try to summarize discussion and Khasim's findings, maybe somebody here has an idea. Latest OMAP git kernel seems to hang on beagle board after some time. You don't see any crash, but

RE: Kernel hang on OMAP3 based Beagle board, RTC issue?

2008-07-02 Thread Gadiyar, Anand
At Beagle IRC there was some discussion [1] [2] today about kernel hang on OMAP3 based Beagle board. I'll try to summarize discussion and Khasim's findings, maybe somebody here has an idea. Latest OMAP git kernel seems to hang on beagle board after some time. You don't see any crash, but

Re: Kernel hang on OMAP3 based Beagle board, RTC issue?

2008-07-02 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 2 jul 2008, om 22:03 heeft Gadiyar, Anand het volgende geschreven: At Beagle IRC there was some discussion [1] [2] today about kernel hang on OMAP3 based Beagle board. I'll try to summarize discussion and Khasim's findings, maybe somebody here has an idea. Latest OMAP git kernel seems

Suggestion required to switch to a new kernel

2008-07-02 Thread suresh
Hi All, We are working on a product which is based on OMAP5912 (OSK). As of now, we are using linux-omap 2.6.16-rc3. We had issues with the JFFS2 cleanmarkers on oneNAND. JFFS2 driver in 2.6.16-rc3 did not understand the segmented OOB in oneNAND. Rather than trying to backport the

Re: Suggestion required to switch to a new kernel

2008-07-02 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:02:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are working on a product which is based on OMAP5912 (OSK). As of now, we are using linux-omap 2.6.16-rc3. We had issues with the JFFS2 cleanmarkers on oneNAND. JFFS2 driver in 2.6.16-rc3 did not understand the segmented