On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:51:08AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
index 1953e3d..a58b91d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ SECTIONS
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 10:02 PM
To: Gopinath, Thara
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; p...@pwsan.com; Cousson, Benoit; Sripathy,
Vishwanath; Sawant, Anand
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] OMAP3: PM: Adding
Hello Carlos,
please find my comments inline
Am 18.10.2010 12:53, schrieb Carlos Chinea:
Hi Peter,
+/**
+ * struct hsi_config - Configuration for RX/TX HSI modules
+ * @mode: Bit transmission mode (STREAM or FRAME)
+ * @flow: Flow type (SYNCHRONIZED or PIPELINE)
+ * @channels: Number of
Hello,
Have a look at this patch, I've some problems with latest kernel from mainline
and a JFFS2 filesystem, the kernel reports various errors like
Header CRC failed on REF_PRISTINE node at 0x1e81315c: Read 0x00e0,
calculated 0x564fc9e8
Applying this patch solves the issue, but I only
This patch adds code that I think was lost when it was applied the commit
5988af2319781bc8e0ce418affec4e09cfa77907 - mtd: Flex-OneNAND support
Test case:
1. Stress a jffs2 filesystem using
bonnie++ -u 0:0 -s 32 -m 16 -r 16
2. dmesg shows various 'Header CRC failed' errors like:
Header
Hello,
The comments of this post also apply to IGEP v2 board (thanks Laurent)
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg36402.html
Changes since v1:
- Split patch in a serie.
- [1/3] onenand_setup = NULL, is a static variable, removed from code.
This patch apply on top of
Set onenand_setup to NULL instead of adding a no-op function.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra eballe...@gmail.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c
The changes are:
- Use 'for' loop instead 'while' loop.
- No need to initialize ret to 0, we're assigning it right after.
- No need to check for onenandcs GPMC_CS_NUM here, it will always be true.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra eballe...@gmail.com
---
Hi Ionut,
On Friday, October 22, 2010 9:09 AM Ionut Nicu wrote:
Most likely I will have to break patch 4/4 from this series (which I
also believe is way too big) into multiple patches and re-submit.
I'm expecting some advices from the maintainers/list on how to split
patch 4 (lst_list
Hi all,
I working with pm-2.6.34 based kernel on Beagleboard. I am not
working with later kernels because I need cpufreq (which is currently
not supported due to upgradation).
My project requires cpufreq transitions at inter-task/intra-task
levels and when I made the changes for that., it seems
10 matches
Mail list logo