Re: [PATCH 0/5] irqchip: kill the GIC routable domain

2014-12-09 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 08/12/14 22:41, Nishanth Menon wrote: Anyways.. The following diff[1] on top of your branch makes DRA7 work - I assume you will squash as needed and repost with linux-omap mailing list in CC. Brilliant. I'll squash that into my tree and repost at some point. I increased the scope of

Re: regression: OMAP4 (next-20141204) (bisect to: ARM: 8208/1: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like)

2014-12-09 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 10:13-20141205, Nishanth Menon wrote: On 12/05/2014 10:10 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: next-20141204 fails to boot, but next-20141203 boots fine with omap2plus_defconfig. Panda-ES(4460): https://github.com/nmenon/kernel-test-logs/blob/next-20141204/omap2plus_defconfig/pandaboard-es.txt

Re: [PATCH 0/5] irqchip: kill the GIC routable domain

2014-12-09 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 09:53-20141209, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 08/12/14 22:41, Nishanth Menon wrote: Anyways.. The following diff[1] on top of your branch makes DRA7 work - I assume you will squash as needed and repost with linux-omap mailing list in CC. Brilliant. I'll squash that into my tree and repost

Re: [PATCH 0/5] irqchip: kill the GIC routable domain

2014-12-09 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 09/12/14 18:17, Nishanth Menon wrote: On 09:53-20141209, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 08/12/14 22:41, Nishanth Menon wrote: Anyways.. The following diff[1] on top of your branch makes DRA7 work - I assume you will squash as needed and repost with linux-omap mailing list in CC. Brilliant. I'll

Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: net : cpsw: Update Kconfig for CPSW

2014-12-09 Thread David Miller
From: Lokesh Vutla lokeshvu...@ti.com Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:24:29 +0530 CPSW is present in AM33xx, AM43xx, DRA7xx. Updating the Kconfig to depend on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS instead of listing all SoC's. Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla lokeshvu...@ti.com Applied to net-next, thanks. -- To unsubscribe

__hci_cmd_sync() not suitable for nokia h4p

2014-12-09 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Major problem with Nokia H4P driver was, that it uses custom functions instead of __hci_cmd_sync(). To recap, code was something like this: (You can see ifdefs with old code and my new replacements). len = sizeof(*neg_cmd) + sizeof(*neg_hdr) + H4_TYPE_SIZE; #undef OLD #ifdef

Re: __hci_cmd_sync() not suitable for nokia h4p

2014-12-09 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Pavel, Major problem with Nokia H4P driver was, that it uses custom functions instead of __hci_cmd_sync(). the __hci_cmd_sync is for sending HCI commands and not low-level protocol transports like H:4 or similar. So you want to separate the actual transport of HCI from the firmware

Re: __hci_cmd_sync() not suitable for nokia h4p

2014-12-09 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Major problem with Nokia H4P driver was, that it uses custom functions instead of __hci_cmd_sync(). the __hci_cmd_sync is for sending HCI commands and not low-level protocol transports like H:4 or similar. So you want to separate the actual transport of HCI from the firmware loading.

Re: __hci_cmd_sync() not suitable for nokia h4p

2014-12-09 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Pavel, Major problem with Nokia H4P driver was, that it uses custom functions instead of __hci_cmd_sync(). the __hci_cmd_sync is for sending HCI commands and not low-level protocol transports like H:4 or similar. So you want to separate the actual transport of HCI from the firmware

[RFC/PATCH 2/7] arm: omap: devicetree: add new properties for OMAP devices

2014-12-09 Thread Felipe Balbi
In order to get rid of some more hwmod data, we introduce a few extra properties to OMAP DT data in order to be able to pass the needed information through DT. Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7

[RFC/PATCH 4/7] arm: omap: device: add support for generating sysconfig data from DT

2014-12-09 Thread Felipe Balbi
After moving sysconfig data to DT, we need to make sure we can generate the same data we have today in C files out of the DT provided properties. This patch adds support for all optional properties documented by a previous commit. Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com ---

[RFC/PATCH 6/7] arm: boot: dts: am4372: add sysconfig data to all HWMODs

2014-12-09 Thread Felipe Balbi
This patch adds all new sysconfig DT properties so they can later be removed from hwmod*data.c files Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com --- Note here, there's still an idea of converting the flags to use macros which would get preprocessed away, I'm yet to do that.

[RFC/PATCH 3/7] arm: omap: hwmod: drop 'const' qualifier from omap_hwmod_class name

2014-12-09 Thread Felipe Balbi
We will be allocating struct omap_hwmod_class for any DT which passes sysc data. Because of that, class-name cannot be const. Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[RFC/PATCH 0/7] arm: omap: move more HWMOD data to DT

2014-12-09 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, here's a more complete series showing the out of debugfs interface. So far only AM43xx has been converted and only those HWMODs which play well with DT and/or are not common with other OMAPs/AM33xx. I plan to work on AM33xx tomorrow, but this RFC shows what we can achieve WRT HWMOD static

[RFC/PATCH 7/7] arm: omap: hwmod: 43xx: remove sysc and class data

2014-12-09 Thread Felipe Balbi
now that this data comes from DT, we can safely remove them from this file. Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_43xx_data.c | 61 -- 1 file changed, 61 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_43xx_data.c

[RFC/PATCH 5/7] arm: omap: hwmod: allow for registration of class-less hwmods

2014-12-09 Thread Felipe Balbi
Before this patch, HWMOD requires the existence of a struct omap_hwmod_class very early. It just so happens that we're moving that data to DeviceTree in a follow-up commit so we need to allow the registration of HWMODs with a valid omap_hwmod_class pointer. When the device is built from DT, we

[RFC/PATCH 1/7] arm: omap: hwmod: add debugfs interface

2014-12-09 Thread Felipe Balbi
By exposing the details of hwmod structures to debugfs we can much more easily verify that changes to hwmod data is correct and won't cause regressions. The idea is that this can be used to check the state of one hwmod, verify hwmod sysc fields, etc. For example, this will be used to move some

Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/7] arm: omap: move more HWMOD data to DT

2014-12-09 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 04:27:45PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: Hi, here's a more complete series showing the out of debugfs interface. So far only AM43xx has been converted and only those HWMODs which play well with DT and/or are not common with other OMAPs/AM33xx. I plan to work on