On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 15:49:59 -0600
, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com
wrote:
Hi Grant,
On 01/13/2015 05:04 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
On 01/13/2015 04:00 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Suman Anna s-a...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 01/13/2015 02:38 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:29 PM, PERIER Romain romain.per...@gmail.com wrote:
What I'm more concerned about is the semantics of the property. What
do the generic code paths gain by standardizing this property? Is it
expected that
We really need to come up with a standard property for this
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:43 PM, PERIER Romain romain.per...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not the final location, I have no idea exactly where I might
put this helper function. This is why I ask you your opinion (and
also, this is why that's a proposal)
2014-10-07 21:45 GMT+02:00 Romain Perier
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:53:43 +0300, Grygorii Strashko
grygorii.stras...@ti.com wrote:
Use clkops-clocks property to specify clocks handled by
clock_ops domain PM domain. Only clocks defined in clkops-clocks
set of clocks will be handled by Runtime PM through clock_ops
Pm domain.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Grygorii Strashko
grygorii.stras...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Grant.
On 07/28/2014 05:05 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:53:43 +0300, Grygorii Strashko
grygorii.stras...@ti.com wrote:
Use clkops-clocks property to specify clocks handled by
clock_ops
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:09:31 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:22:50AM -0400, Jason Kridner wrote:
Adding devicetree and linux-arm-kernel lists based on feedback on IRC...
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Jason Kridner
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:54:37 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:44:58 -0700, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven geert+rene
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 23:54:37 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven
ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Grant
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014 01:21:41 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:02:27AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 08:30:32PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
Since we now automatically enable early BRESP in core L2C-310 code when
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:44:58 -0700, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven geert+rene...@glider.be writes:
When adding a device from DT, check if its clocks are suitable for Runtime
PM, and register them with the PM core.
If Runtime PM is disabled, just enable the
, and
dropped __of_populate() hunks]
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
Can you try this? It should fix it (plus it should be in -next soon)
Thanks, that fixes the issue (tested on omap4 panda).
Tomi
Yeah I know; my beaglebone hangs as well without it :)
Hi Tomi
On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 12:47:53 +0100, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
I'm probably missing something here, but why not #ifdef CONFIG_OF?
I have been told for other drivers, that IS_ENABLED() is
the prefered way to check for configuration these days.
+ interrupt handler) - interrupts 9 and 2.
+
+Optional properties:
+- bb-uvolt: microvolts for charging the backup battery.
+- bb-uamp: microamps for charging the backup battery.
prop should have vendor prefix.
ti,bb-uvolt, ti,bb-uamp
Agreed. Otherwise:
Acked-by: Grant Likely
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 06:49:48 -0700, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat
wake-up events from deeper idle states as interrupts.
There's a separate io chain controller on most omaps
that stays enabled when the device hits off-idle and
/of/platform.c portion:
Acked-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:57:00 +0200, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de
wrote:
Am 12.09.2013 17:19, schrieb Stephen Warren:
IRQs, DMA channels, and GPIOs are all different things. Their bindings
are defined independently. While it's good to define new types of
bindings consistently
s.nawro...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang w...@the-dreams.de
Acked-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
---
V2-V3: Was trying to be too smart by only fixing includes needed.
Took a more general approach this time, converting of_i2c.h
to i2c.h in case i2c.h
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
To solve this dilemma, perform an interrupt consistency check
when adding a GPIO chip: if the chip is both gpio-controller and
interrupt-controller, walk all children of the device tree,
check if these in turn
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:16:07 -0500, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/21/2013 06:44 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/21/2013 09:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 07/19/2013 01:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/21/2013 09:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 07/19/2013 01:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
So I called of_platform_populate() on a device to get each child device
probed and on rmmod and I need to reverse its
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
martinez.jav...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, It doesn't apply cleanly to your next branch cleanly because
this patch-set depends on the following bugfix patch
a GPIO as input and enabling the GPIO bank.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk
Acked-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
---
Changes since v2:
- Unconditionally do the IRQ setup in the .map() function and
only call irq_create_mapping() in the gpio
...@collabora.co.uk
Acked-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@linaro.org
---
Changes since v2:
- Only make the call to gpio_request_one() conditional in the DT
case as suggested by Grant Likely.
Changes since v1:
- Split the irq domain mapping function handler and the GPIO
request in two
Hi Linus,
It took a while to work out the correct solution to this regression.
It is sorted now. This branch was constructed and tested by Tony. I've
verified that it builds and signed the tag. Please pull into v3.10.
g.
The following changes since commit
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca [130624 09:00]:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Javier Martinez Canillas martinez.jav...@gmail.com [130623 18:08]:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:50:53 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
When a GPIO is defined as an interrupt line using Device
Tree, a call to irq_create_of_mapping() is made that calls
irq_create_mapping(). So, is not necessary to do the mapping
on the OMAP GPIO
On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 00:50:54 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
When an OMAP GPIO is used as an IRQ line, a call to gpio_request()
has to be made to initialize the OMAP GPIO bank before a driver
request the IRQ. Otherwise the call to request_irq() fails.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Javier Martinez Canillas martinez.jav...@gmail.com [130623 18:08]:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Aaro Koskinen aaro.koski...@iki.fi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 01:06:37AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas
On Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:39:16 -0700, Mike Turquette mturque...@linaro.org
wrote:
Parses OMAP clock data from DT and registers those clocks with the clock
framework. dt_omap_clk_init must be called early during boot for timer
initialization so it is exported and called from the existing clock
___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:29:43 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On 06/11/2013 04:48 PM, Florian Vaussard wrote:
Use the MTD constants for NAND and OneNAND nodes used in OMAP3
DTS.
Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard florian.vauss...@epfl.ch
---
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:31:24 -0500, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
On 04/26/2013 02:31 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
martinez.jav...@gmail.com wrote:
So:
+static int omap_gpio_irq_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *d,
+
fax: +41 21 693 78 07
http://lsro.epfl.ch
___
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe
...@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
, irq_base,
+ 0, irq_domain_simple_ops, NULL);
if (bank-regs-set_dataout bank-regs-clr_dataout)
bank-set_dataout = _set_gpio_dataout_reg;
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:44:05 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On 04/09/2013 12:05 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 04/05/2013 02:48 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
This means that drivers that need the IRQ type/level flags defined in
the DT won't be able
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:48:08 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas
javier.marti...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
[...]
irq_of_parse_and_map() calls to irq_create_of_mapping() which calls to
the correct xlate function handler according to #interrupt-cells
(irq_domain_xlate_onecell or
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:48:07 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
wrote:
On Tuesday 16 April 2013 01:20 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:56:10 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
wrote:
On Monday 15 April 2013 05:04 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar
.
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com
Acked-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
---
.../devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt | 28
++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpmc-nand.txt
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:41:59 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
wrote:
Added a generic PHY framework that provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers
to create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference to
the PHY with or without using phandle. To obtain a reference
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:42:00 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
wrote:
The PHY framework provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers to
create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference to the
PHY with or without using phandle. To obtain a reference to the PHY
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:06:37 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 15 April 2013 03:50 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:41:59 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
wrote:
Added a generic PHY framework that provides a set of APIs
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:35:48 -0500, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
Adds a function to read the various GPMC chip-select settings from
device-tree and store them in the gpmc_settings structure.
Update the GPMC device-tree binding documentation to describe these
options.
Signed-off-by:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 17:56:10 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 15 April 2013 05:04 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:42:00 +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
wrote:
The PHY framework provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers
;
+ manufacturer = Texas Instruments;
+ part-number = BB-BONE-FOO-01;
+ };
+ };
+
+};
+
--
1.7.12
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 12:10:20 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Lee,
On Jan 8, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
At the end of the line, some kind of hardware glue is going to be
needed.
I just feel that drawing from a sample size of 1 (maybe 2 if I
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:42:32 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
The 3rd patch is in preparation for some patches I have in WIP that would
allow
drivers to set notifications for properties that are changed in runtime.
Okay, submit it with that series
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:01 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Mar 16, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:58:02 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:58:02 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi David,
On Jan 23, 2013, at 6:40 AM, David Gibson wrote:
Ok. Nonetheless it's not hard to avoid a recursive approach here.
How can I find the maximum phandle value of a subtree without using
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:31:07 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
There are other users for the proc DT functions.
Export them.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou pa...@antoniou-consulting.com
Actually, I cannot find the user of this patch. Why is it needed?
g.
--
To
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:31:07 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
There are other users for the proc DT functions.
Export them.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou pa...@antoniou-consulting.com
Hi Pantelis.
Patches 1 2 look good. No comments there.
This patch
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:01:22 -0600, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
On 02/26/2013 04:44 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/26/2013 03:40 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
On 02/26/2013 04:01 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
Are you requesting the gpio anywhere? If not then this is not going to
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:22:47 -0600, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
Currently the OMAP GPIO driver uses a legacy mapping for the GPIO IRQ
domain. This is not necessary because we do not need to assign a
specific interrupt number to the GPIO IRQ domain. Therefore, convert
the OMAP GPIO
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013 11:22:48 -0600, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
For OMAP devices, if a gpio is being used as an interrupt source but has
not been requested by calling gpio_request(), a call to request_irq()
may cause the kernel hang because the gpio bank may be disabled and
hence the
DT nodes to it sounds like
the wrong thing to be doing.
Right; I'd expect your platform device creation to go through the
of_platform_populate() route. What is your use-case?
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
martinez.jav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 02:49:21AM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
I knew this would be controversial and
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:09:35 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
wrote:
Hi Linus,
On 01/10/2013 11:41 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
wrote:
Use more coherent locking in the driver. Use bitfield to store the
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013 16:17:24 +0530, Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com
wrote:
On Wednesday 06 February 2013 04:14 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
'const static ' is not a common order, better to use 'static const'
instead.
building:
make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W ARCH=arm
= gpio3 28 0;
+ ti,non-removable;
+ bus-width = 4;
+ vmmc-supply = ldo2_reg;
+ vmmc_aux-supply = vmmc;
+ };
Binding looks reasonable.
Reviewed-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com wrote:
On 12/19/2012 06:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:52:07 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
wrote:
This GPIO driver should not configure anything else then GPIOs.
Signed-off-by: Peter
);
--
1.8.0
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
an
--
1.8.0
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-gpio_chip);
if (status 0)
return status;
--
1.8.0
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 21:53:23 +0100, Michael Trimarchi
mich...@amarulasolutions.com wrote:
Hi
Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 11:52:06 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi
peter.ujfal...@ti.com wrote:
Use more coherent locking in the driver. Use bitfield to store
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:05:53 +1100, NeilBrown ne...@suse.de wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:57:07 -0700 Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com
wrote:
OK thanks, I'll queue this up for v3.6-rc as this should qualify as a
regression.
I don't think this did actually get queued. At least
the generic GPMC timing parameters and some
documentation with examples on how to use them.
Successfully tested on an AM33xx board.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com
For all patches in this series:
Acked-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
--
To unsubscribe from this list
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 16:55:46 +0200, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:32:24AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:46:00 +0200, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
there are a few spi master drivers which make
use of that flag but there is no way
);
+
+ complete(mcspi_dma-dma_tx_completion);
}
static void omap2_mcspi_tx_dma(struct spi_device *spi,
--
1.8.1.rc1.5.g7e0651a
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:02:10 -0600, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
So looking at this today, here is what I see when comparing the
registers ...
omap2430 != omap2420
omap3430 != omap2430
omap3630 == omap3430
omap4430 != omap3430
omap4460 == omap4430
omap543x == omap4430
am335x !=
;
+ if (of_find_property(nc, spi-loopback, NULL))
+ spi-mode |= SPI_LOOP;
/* Device speed */
prop = of_get_property(nc, spi-max-frequency, len);
--
1.8.1.rc1.5.g7e0651a
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On 12/07/2012 09:09 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
wrote:
As Grant commneted on the first version:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/5/53
properties:
+- ti,system-power-controller: Telling whether or not rtc is controlling
+ the system power.
+
Acked-by: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Example:
rtc@1c23000 {
@@ -14,4 +18,5 @@ rtc@1c23000 {
interrupts = 19
19;
interrupt-parent = intc
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:16:33 +0530, Philip, Avinash avinashphi...@ti.com
wrote:
The ELM hardware module can be used to speedup BCH 4/8/16 ECC scheme
error correction.
For now only 4 8 bit support is added
Signed-off-by: Philip, Avinash avinashphi...@ti.com
Cc: Grant Likely grant.lik
),
},
};
--
1.7.11.7
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:49:45 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com wrote:
When the GPIO is configured as output we need to read the GPIODATAOUT*
register to get correct information. When the GPIO is output the GPIODATAIN*
registers report 0 all the time (no feedback from output path).
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 16:33:48 -0600, Jon Hunter jon-hun...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On 12/05/2012 04:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012 20:09:31 +0100, Daniel Mack zon...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch adds basic DT bindings for OMAP GPMC.
The actual peripherals are instantiated
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 07:47:52 +0100, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 04:10:24PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:54:57 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
wrote:
Hi Grant, Lars, Thierry,
On 11/26/2012 04:46 PM
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
One other problem is that some PWM devices cannot be setup to achieve a
0% or 100% duty-cycle but instead will toggle for at least one period.
This would be another argument in favour of moving the
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:54:57 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
wrote:
Hi Grant, Lars, Thierry,
On 11/26/2012 04:46 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
You're effectively asking the pwm layer to behave like a gpio (which
is completely reasonable). Having a completely separate translation
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:44:36 +0100, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
wrote:
Hi Grant,
On 11/23/2012 10:13 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Hi Grant,
On 11/23/2012 08:55 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
Ugh. and this is why I wanted the PWM and GPIO subsystems to use the
same namespace
node itself and the translation code should
be in either the pwm or the gpio core. I don't think it should look like
a separate device.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message
On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:27:18 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote:
On 16:23 Fri 09 Nov , Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/09/2012 09:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
However, I think the process for an end-user needs to be as simple as
drop this .dts/.dtb file
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:04:24 -0500, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/31/2012 10:57 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
This simple patch enables dynamic changes of the DT tree on runtime
to be visible to the device-tree proc interface.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:57:33 +0200, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Export an interface that other in-kernel users can utilize.
Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou pa...@antoniou-consulting.com
I'm not going to apply this before an in-kernel user exists for this. I
know
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
Not good to rely on userspace kicking off dtc and compiling from source.
Some capes/expansion boards might have your root fs device, for example
there is an
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Nov 9, 2012, at 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
Hi,
* Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com [121105 13:42]:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
Jane is building custom BeagleBone expansion boards called 'capes'. She
can
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Mitch Bradley w...@firmworks.com wrote:
On 11/6/2012 12:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
This proposal is very oriented at an overlay-based approach. I'm not
totally convinced that a pure overlay approach (as in how dtc does
overlayed DT nodes) will be flexible
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Yes, the locking does need to be sorted out.
Perhaps come up with a dt-stress test tool/boot time validator?
I would like that. I've started
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Maybe some extra version match table can just be passed during the board
machine_init
of_platform_populate(NULL, omap_dt_match_table, NULL, NULL,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:26 AM, David Gibson
da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
Summary points:
- Create an FDT overlay data format and usage model
- SHALL reliable resolve or validate of phandles between base and
overlay trees
So, I'm not at all clear on what this proposed phandle
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
I hope I'm not too late to reply as I'm traveling.
On Nov 6, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Joanne has purchased one of Jane's capes and packaged it into a
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:26 AM, David Gibson
da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
(3) Resolving phandle references from the subtree to the main tree.
So, I think this can actually be avoided, at least in cases where what
physical connections are available to the expansion module is well
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/08/2012 07:26 PM, David Gibson wrote:
...
I also think graft will handle most of your use cases, although as I
said I don't fully understand the implications of some of them, so I
could be wrong. So, the
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
Here's one
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/09/2012 09:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
...
I do rather suspect this use-case is quite common. NVIDIA certainly has
a bunch
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 6, 2012, at 4:06 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Sure, so if we add data type supplementary properties to the tree to
indicate the data type as indirect phandle, then kernel could refer
to the index in
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 6, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
For hot-plugging, you need it. Whether kernel code can deal
1 - 100 of 399 matches
Mail list logo
