Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: VFP: Fixed suspend and added context save support

2010-05-13 Thread ye janboe
+ peoples who are in CC list. Janboe Ye 2010/5/13 ye janboe janboe...@gmail.com: Thanks for Russell and Tony. I think this patch is needed when MPU support OFF mode, special on omap. Otherwise, VFP state will be lost. Reviewed-by: Janboe Ye janboe...@gmail.com 2010/5/12 Russell King

Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] ARM: VFP: Fixed suspend and added context save support

2010-05-10 Thread ye janboe
hi, Russell, Tony Is this patch ignored by you? I do not see any ack for this patch. Thanks Janboe Ye 2009/12/3 Tero Kristo tero.kri...@nokia.com: From: Tero Kristo tero.kri...@nokia.com In some ARM architectures, like OMAP3, the VFP context can be lost during dynamic sleep cycle. For this

[PATCH] flush the function in sdram is not correct because sram is changed.

2009-08-28 Thread ye janboe
resend because little format issue. From fc5e771b808b5bf094846051a1c59c7e5e8ec149 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: janboe janboe...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:50:57 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] flush the function in sdram is not correct because sram is changed. Signed-off-by: janboe

[PATCH] flush the right address after memcpy in omap_sram_push

2009-08-28 Thread ye janboe
Signed-off-by: janboe janboe...@gmail.com --- arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c index f2b0fa6..f549d8a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c @@

Re: [PATCH] flush the function in sdram is not correct because sram is changed.

2009-08-28 Thread ye janboe
Hi, Paul I resent the patch after fix the format issue. Please help to review it. Thanks Janboe 2009/8/28 Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com: Hello janboe, On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, ye janboe wrote: From f10090bf307066f1317d7152c6f9a6f395007d4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: janboe janboe

[PATCH] OMAP SRAM: flush the right address after memcpy in omap_sram_push

2009-08-28 Thread ye janboe
the original flush operation is to flush the function address which is copied from. But we do not change the function code and it is not necessary to flush it. Signed-off-by: janboe janboe...@gmail.com --- arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

[PATCH] flush the function in sdram is not correct because sram is changed.

2009-08-27 Thread ye janboe
From f10090bf307066f1317d7152c6f9a6f395007d4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: janboe janboe...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:50:57 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] flush the function in sdram is not correct because sram is changed. Signed-off-by: janboe janboe...@gmail.com ---

[PATCH] Clear the SDRC_POWER.PWRENA bit before putting the SDRAM into self-refresh before suspend

2009-07-07 Thread ye janboe
Hi, Paul I saw you clear clear the SDRC PWRENA bit during SDRC frequency change but not during suspend. Please review if it is necessary to clear PWRENA bit during suspend. Thanks Janboe Ye rom 287db2e188391be0ac95128131724e0e035e945a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: janboe janboe...@gmail.com

[PATCH] initialize gpio debounce register

2009-06-19 Thread ye janboe
Hi, some bootloader may initialize debounce register and this will make dbclk not consist with the debounce register after linux kernel boot up. From 8f97e5b50e50627e9e4b40f5d4fba09d750aceb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: janboe janboe...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:56:02 -0500 Subject: