RE: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-07-10 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 20:57:43, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [120704 01:20]: * Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [120704 00:29]: * Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com [120703 06:12]: Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall under omap3 class

Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-07-10 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Hiremath, Vaibhav hvaib...@ti.com [120710 01:43]: Can we clean these branches; it is very confusing to track with so many multiple versions? Yeah I'll drop some after the merge window.. Also, One patch still has not merged is, [PATCH-V2] ARM: OMAP: cpu: Make cpu_class_is_omap2 true

Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-07-05 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [120704 01:20]: * Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [120704 00:29]: * Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com [120703 06:12]: Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries Cortex-A8

Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-07-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com [120703 06:12]: Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support (like, clock, power and hwmod) support, it is observed

Re: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-07-04 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [120704 00:29]: * Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com [120703 06:12]: Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support

RE: [RESEND PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-07-04 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:54:54, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com [120703 06:12]: Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support

[RESEND PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-07-03 Thread Vaibhav Hiremath
Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support (like, clock, power and hwmod) support, it is observed that, we are creating more and more problems by treating

RE: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-05-09 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 01:38:34, Tony Lindgren wrote: * Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com [120508 08:32]: --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig @@ -123,8 +123,11 @@ config SOC_OMAPTI81XX config SOC_OMAPAM33XX bool AM33XX support - depends on

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-05-08 Thread Vaibhav Hiremath
Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support (like, clock, power and hwmod) support, it is observed that, we are creating more and more problems by treating

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-05-08 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com [120508 08:32]: --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig @@ -123,8 +123,11 @@ config SOC_OMAPTI81XX config SOC_OMAPAM33XX bool AM33XX support - depends on ARCH_OMAP3 + depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS This is not

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-05-08 Thread Kevin Hilman
Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com writes: Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support (like, clock, power and hwmod) support, it is observed that, we are

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: am33xx: Make am33xx as a separate class

2012-05-08 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com [120508 15:00]: Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com writes: Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support (like, clock,