Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: clockdomain: fix accidental duplicate registration

2012-07-24 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com [120719 12:17]: On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: Well I'm still a bit confused :) Which branch in arm-soc tree should this fix be applied then? In terms of arm-soc, it's needed in arm-soc for-next, due to commit

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: clockdomain: fix accidental duplicate registration

2012-07-24 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: OK looks like Linus fixed up part of it, care to check what's needed against current mainline now? Current mainline seems to be okay here. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: clockdomain: fix accidental duplicate registration

2012-07-19 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com [120718 02:58]: Hi On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: Hmm well it seems that we should apply this fix into arm-soc next/cleanup branch if that's where the mismerge happened? It seems the same mismerge is there even without 16e5e2c4? The arm-soc

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: clockdomain: fix accidental duplicate registration

2012-07-19 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: Well I'm still a bit confused :) Which branch in arm-soc tree should this fix be applied then? In terms of arm-soc, it's needed in arm-soc for-next, due to commit 066b6eba6d58ad1cb9ec3917b6ee79730c3c3310 (Merge branch 'next/cleanup' into for-next).

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: clockdomain: fix accidental duplicate registration

2012-07-18 Thread Paul Walmsley
Hi On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: Hmm well it seems that we should apply this fix into arm-soc next/cleanup branch if that's where the mismerge happened? It seems the same mismerge is there even without 16e5e2c4? The arm-soc next/cleanup copy of mach-omap2/clockdomains3xxx_data.c

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: clockdomain: fix accidental duplicate registration

2012-07-16 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com [120714 10:59]: On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: The patch seems to produce a new warning against arm soc tree next/cleanup branch: warning: ‘mpu_3xxx_clkdm’ defined but not used Paul, care to check if a change is needed for the arm soc

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: clockdomain: fix accidental duplicate registration

2012-07-14 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [120712 23:52]: * Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com [120712 10:55]: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com writes: Commit 3dd50d0545bd5a8ad83d4339f07935cd3e883271 (Merge tag 'omap-cleanup-for-v3.6' into tmp-merge) inadvertently caused a clockdomain to be

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: clockdomain: fix accidental duplicate registration

2012-07-14 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote: As the tmp-merge branch has other branches and never goes upstream, the commit should say: Commit 472fd5401561f94698f4c8f9dbbbfbf76ab55626 (Merge branch 'cleanup-hwmod' into cleanup)... So I've updated the patch and applied it into l-o master.

Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: clockdomain: fix accidental duplicate registration

2012-07-13 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Kevin Hilman khil...@ti.com [120712 10:55]: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com writes: Commit 3dd50d0545bd5a8ad83d4339f07935cd3e883271 (Merge tag 'omap-cleanup-for-v3.6' into tmp-merge) inadvertently caused a clockdomain to be registered twice on OMAP3 boards. This causes warnings on

[PATCH] ARM: OMAP3: clockdomain: fix accidental duplicate registration

2012-07-12 Thread Paul Walmsley
Commit 3dd50d0545bd5a8ad83d4339f07935cd3e883271 (Merge tag 'omap-cleanup-for-v3.6' into tmp-merge) inadvertently caused a clockdomain to be registered twice on OMAP3 boards. This causes warnings on boot, wild pointer dereferences, and PM regressions. Fix the double registration and add some