-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:10 PM
To: Shilimkar, Santosh
Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Paul Walmsley; Cousson,
Benoit
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: hmwod: Update the sysc_cache in case
On 10/21/2010 12:13 PM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
snip
Hi Kevin,
What the patch does is reprogram's the sysc value (from the cache)
whenever its lost. So its infact saved in the cache and restored when
needed.
Otherwise, all this patch does is refresh the _sysc_cache with
completely unknown
Nayak, Rajendra rna...@ti.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:10 PM
To: Shilimkar, Santosh
Cc: Nayak, Rajendra; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Paul Walmsley; Cousson,
Benoit
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP:
Shilimkar, Santosh santosh.shilim...@ti.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 3:44 AM
To: Nayak, Rajendra
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Paul Walmsley; Cousson, Benoit; Shilimkar,
Santosh
Subject: Re:
Do not skip the sysc programming in the hmwod framework based
on the cached value alone, since at times the module might have lost
context (due to the Powerdomain in which the module belongs
transitions to either Open Switch RET or OFF).
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak rna...@ti.com
Cc: Paul
Rajendra Nayak rna...@ti.com writes:
Do not skip the sysc programming in the hmwod framework based
on the cached value alone, since at times the module might have lost
context (due to the Powerdomain in which the module belongs
transitions to either Open Switch RET or OFF).
Shouldn't the
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 3:44 AM
To: Nayak, Rajendra
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Paul Walmsley; Cousson, Benoit; Shilimkar,
Santosh
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP: hmwod: Update the sysc_cache in case