Hi Mark,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:47:35AM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
Hi Mark,
Hi Jean. Thanks for the review.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 10:47:35AM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
Hi Mark,
Hi Jean. Thanks for the review.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
Some parts of the OMAP code assume that all power
domains support certain states (e.g., RET OFF).
This isn't always true (e.g., the am35x family of
SoC's) so
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
Some parts of the OMAP code assume that all power
domains support certain states (e.g., RET OFF).
This isn't always true (e.g., the am35x family of
SoC's) so those assumptions need to be removed.
Remove those assumptions by looking up the deepest
state
