Re: [PATCH] perf: Use pre-empt safe cpu_get/put insted of smp_processor_id

2012-09-07 Thread Roger Quadros
Hi Jean, My bad, I didn't follow up with this. My guess is that it has not been picked up. Tony, Kevin? regards, -roger On 09/06/2012 09:59 PM, Jean Pihet wrote: Fixed Paul's email address On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Jean Pihet jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote: Hi Roger, On Fri, Aug

Re: [PATCH] perf: Use pre-empt safe cpu_get/put insted of smp_processor_id

2012-09-07 Thread Kevin Hilman
Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com writes: Hi Jean, My bad, I didn't follow up with this. My guess is that it has not been picked up. Tony, Kevin? Wasn't picked up by me (but should've been, sorry.) Care to refresh against v3.6-rc4 and resend? Thanks, Kevin On 09/06/2012 09:59 PM, Jean

Re: [PATCH] perf: Use pre-empt safe cpu_get/put insted of smp_processor_id

2012-09-06 Thread Jean Pihet
Hi Roger, On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com wrote: gets rid of below messages with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled [ 28.832916] debug_smp_processor_id: 18 callbacks suppressed [ 28.832946] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:

Re: [PATCH] perf: Use pre-empt safe cpu_get/put insted of smp_processor_id

2012-09-06 Thread Jean Pihet
Fixed Paul's email address On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Jean Pihet jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote: Hi Roger, On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Roger Quadros rog...@ti.com wrote: gets rid of below messages with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled [ 28.832916] debug_smp_processor_id: 18

[PATCH] perf: Use pre-empt safe cpu_get/put insted of smp_processor_id

2012-08-10 Thread Roger Quadros
gets rid of below messages with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled [ 28.832916] debug_smp_processor_id: 18 callbacks suppressed [ 28.832946] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code: modprobe/1763 [ 28.841491] caller is pwrdm_set_next_pwrst+0x54/0x120 Signed-off-by: Roger