On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 05/12/2012 05:49 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
We have some pinctrl drivers implementing gpiolib too already,
and it's unavoidable I think, as some recent discussion about
matcing struct gpio_chip and pinctrl GPIO
On 05/16/2012 01:14 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 05/12/2012 05:49 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
...
Maybe -simple isn't such a good name for this thing. Noone thinks
any kind of pin control is simple in any sense of the
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120514 11:42]:
On 05/12/2012 05:49 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
Also, were you intending pinctrl-simple to actually be the GPIO
controller itself? That'd be another case
On 05/12/2012 05:49 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
Also, were you intending pinctrl-simple to actually be the GPIO
controller itself? That'd be another case that one might consider fairly
simple, but then extends to being
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
Also, were you intending pinctrl-simple to actually be the GPIO
controller itself? That'd be another case that one might consider fairly
simple, but then extends to being gpio-simple as well as pinctrl-simple...
We
On 05/10/2012 11:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120510 10:09]:
On 05/09/2012 02:49 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120509 13:22]:
On 05/04/2012 04:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120504
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120511 12:21]:
The mapping of GPIO to pinctrl pins would presumably be driven solely by
the HW design of the pin controller and GPIO, and not by the mux
selection in the pin controller (otherwise, I'd argue this isn't a
simple case that should be
On 05/11/2012 01:51 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120511 12:21]:
The mapping of GPIO to pinctrl pins would presumably be driven solely by
the HW design of the pin controller and GPIO, and not by the mux
selection in the pin controller (otherwise, I'd argue
On 05/09/2012 02:49 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120509 13:22]:
On 05/04/2012 04:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120504 11:59]:
On 05/04/2012 10:34 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120504 12:27]:
On 05/02/2012 11:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-simple.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-simple.txt
...
On
On 05/04/2012 04:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120504 11:59]:
On 05/04/2012 10:34 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120504 08:58]:
On 08:03 Fri 04 May , Tony Lindgren wrote:
so I was thinking to do
On 05/04/2012 08:04 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 12:55 Fri 04 May , Stephen Warren wrote:
On 05/04/2012 10:34 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120504 08:58]:
On 08:03 Fri 04 May , Tony Lindgren wrote:
so I was
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120509 13:22]:
On 05/04/2012 04:08 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120504 11:59]:
On 05/04/2012 10:34 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120504 08:58]:
On 08:03 Fri 04
* Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org [120509 02:13]:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
Also I think we should let the pinctrl
core eventually manage the pins more too. Right now the pins are
a static array in the driver, which makes things
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120509 13:19]:
On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120504 12:27]:
On 05/02/2012 11:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-simple.txt
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120503 22:08]:
In my mind in the driver we do not have to care how to list
register/unregister the group. We just need to be able to do this
pinctrl_register_group(...)
or
pinctrl_unregistewr_group(...)
On at91 we have this
On 08:03 Fri 04 May , Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120503 22:08]:
In my mind in the driver we do not have to care how to list
register/unregister the group. We just need to be able to do this
pinctrl_register_group(...)
or
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120504 08:58]:
On 08:03 Fri 04 May , Tony Lindgren wrote:
so I was thinking to do like on gpio
uart {
pin = pioA 12 {pararms}
}
Hmm I assume the 12 above the gpio number?
no pin number in the bank
On 09:34 Fri 04 May , Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120504 08:58]:
On 08:03 Fri 04 May , Tony Lindgren wrote:
so I was thinking to do like on gpio
uart {
pin = pioA 12 {pararms}
}
Hmm I
On 05/04/2012 10:34 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120504 08:58]:
On 08:03 Fri 04 May , Tony Lindgren wrote:
so I was thinking to do like on gpio
uart {
pin = pioA 12 {pararms}
}
Hmm I assume the 12 above the gpio number?
no
On 05/02/2012 11:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Add simple pinctrl driver using device tree data.
Currently this driver only works on omap2+ series of
processors, where there is either an 8 or 16-bit padconf
register for each pin. Support for other similar pinmux
controllers could be added.
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120504 12:27]:
On 05/02/2012 11:24 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-simple.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-simple.txt
+Required properties:
+- compatible : one of:
* Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org [120504 11:59]:
On 05/04/2012 10:34 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120504 08:58]:
On 08:03 Fri 04 May , Tony Lindgren wrote:
so I was thinking to do like on gpio
uart {
pin = pioA 12
On 12:55 Fri 04 May , Stephen Warren wrote:
On 05/04/2012 10:34 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120504 08:58]:
On 08:03 Fri 04 May , Tony Lindgren wrote:
so I was thinking to do like on gpio
uart {
pin = pioA 12 {pararms}
Hi,
I really like it
I was working on something simillar
but can we split the group management so we can use it on other
bindings
Best Regards,
J.
On 10:24 Wed 02 May , Tony Lindgren wrote:
Add simple pinctrl driver using device tree data.
Currently
Hi,
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120503 00:16]:
I really like it
I was working on something simillar
but can we split the group management so we can use it on other
bindings
Hmm I'm not sure I follow on the group management
On 05/03/2012 09:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Hi,
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120503 00:16]:
I really like it
I was working on something simillar
but can we split the group management so we can use it on other
bindings
Hmm I'm not sure
On 16:34 Thu 03 May , Stephen Warren wrote:
On 05/03/2012 09:27 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Hi,
* Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com [120503 00:16]:
I really like it
I was working on something simillar
but can we split the group management so we
28 matches
Mail list logo
