On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:06:40PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
So I don't think weak symbols work like we want them to.
That was the conclusion I came
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:33:14PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:11:31AM +, Dave Martin wrote:
Do we need to consider any other discarded sections? In vmlinux.lds, I have:
/* Default discards */
/DISCARD/ : { *(.exit.text) *(.cpuexit.text) *(.memexit.text)
*(.exit.data) *(.cpuexit.data) *(.cpuexit.rodata) *(.memexit.data)
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Nicolas Pitre nicolas.pi...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Hmm, actually it looks like you can end up with configurations where the
spinlocks are inlined.
That means
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:42:41AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
Alternatively, I wonder .alt.smp.init could make weak references
instead of normal references: then if the referenced section is
discarded, the reference will revert to 0 and the fixup
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:42:41AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
Alternatively, I wonder .alt.smp.init could make weak references
instead of normal references: then
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
So I don't think weak symbols work like we want them to.
That was the conclusion I came to also ... the linker seems to resolve
references in each object
Hi there,
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
SMP requires at least the ARMv6K extensions to be present, so if we're
running on SMP, the WFE and SEV instructions must be available.
However, when we run on UP, the v6K extensions may not be
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 04:43:52PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
A couple of questions on this:
1) I notice these spinlock functions are generally marked inline.
Is that likely to happen in modules? If so, there would be a need to
do SMP_ON_UP fixups at module load time -- I don't think
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 04:43:52PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
A couple of questions on this:
1) I notice these spinlock functions are generally marked inline.
Is that likely to happen in modules? If so,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:33:14PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 04:43:52PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
A couple of questions on this:
1) I notice these spinlock functions are
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:33:14PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 04:43:52PM +, Dave Martin wrote:
A couple of questions
SMP requires at least the ARMv6K extensions to be present, so if we're
running on SMP, the WFE and SEV instructions must be available.
However, when we run on UP, the v6K extensions may not be available,
and so we don't want WFE/SEV to be in the instruction stream. Use the
SMP alternatives
13 matches
Mail list logo
