2010/9/7 Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@mvista.com:
Hello.
Ming Lei wrote:
Which codebase is this patch meant for?
I don't see the hb_mult in current mainline code?
Are there any patches which this one depends on?
This depends on the two iso for device mode patches:
tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com
This patch fixes one bugs of OUT transfer in double buffer case:
-the current code only enable autoclear for dma mode 1, and not
for dma mode 0
Without this patch, test #5 of usbtest can't be passed if we
configure
2010/9/6 Gadiyar, Anand gadi...@ti.com:
Hi Tom,
Which codebase is this patch meant for?
I don't see the hb_mult in current mainline code?
Are there any patches which this one depends on?
This depends on the two iso for device mode patches:
Hello.
Ming Lei wrote:
Which codebase is this patch meant for?
I don't see the hb_mult in current mainline code?
Are there any patches which this one depends on?
This depends on the two iso for device mode patches:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-usbm=128076716001885w=2
From: Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com
This patch fixes one bugs of OUT transfer in double buffer case:
-the current code only enable autoclear for dma mode 1, and not
for dma mode 0
Without this patch, test #5 of usbtest can't be passed if we
configure musb as g_zero and use fifo mode 3 to
tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com
This patch fixes one bugs of OUT transfer in double buffer case:
-the current code only enable autoclear for dma mode 1, and not
for dma mode 0
Without this patch, test #5 of usbtest can't be passed if we
configure
2010/8/27 Gadiyar, Anand gadi...@ti.com:
tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com
This patch fixes one bugs of OUT transfer in double buffer case:
-the current code only enable autoclear for dma mode 1, and not
for dma mode 0
Without this patch, test #5 of
