Hi,
On Friday 23 August 2013 10:17 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 05:03 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
maps crossbar number- to interrupt number and
calls request_irq(int_no, crossbar_handler,..)
So will this mapping happen based on some data passed from DT or
just based on
On Friday 23 August 2013 11:41 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 23 August 2013 10:17 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 05:03 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
maps crossbar number- to interrupt number and
calls request_irq(int_no, crossbar_handler,..)
So will this mapping
On Friday 23 August 2013 11:41 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 23 August 2013 10:17 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 05:03 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
maps crossbar number- to interrupt number and
calls request_irq(int_no, crossbar_handler,..)
So will this mapping
On Friday 23 August 2013 12:06 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 11:41 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 23 August 2013 10:17 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 05:03 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
maps crossbar number- to interrupt number and
calls
On Friday 23 August 2013 12:23 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 12:06 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 11:41 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 23 August 2013 10:17 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Thursday 22 August 2013 05:03 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
maps
On Friday 23 August 2013 04:14 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 12:23 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 12:06 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 11:41 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 23 August 2013 10:17 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Thursday 22
On 8/23/2013 7:08 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 04:14 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 12:23 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 12:06 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
On Friday 23 August 2013 11:41 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 23 August 2013
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
On 8/23/2013 7:08 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
The whole point we are moving to domain is not have any default
mapping(connection done) at DT level. Rather DT only specifies the
peripherals and their cross-bar connection
On Friday 23 August 2013 03:06 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
On 8/23/2013 7:08 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
The whole point we are moving to domain is not have any default
mapping(connection done) at DT level. Rather DT only
Hi Linus,
On Thursday 22 August 2013 02:40 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 August 2013 04:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
(...)
Sorry I don't understand what thread that is... can you point me there?
My
On Thursday 22 August 2013 07:33 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Linus,
On Thursday 22 August 2013 02:40 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 August 2013 04:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
(...)
Sorry I don't
On Thursday 22 August 2013 05:03 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
maps crossbar number- to interrupt number and
calls request_irq(int_no, crossbar_handler,..)
So will this mapping happen based on some data passed from DT or
just based on whats available when the device does a request_irq()?
If its
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 August 2013 04:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
(...)
Sorry I don't understand what thread that is... can you point me there?
My previous statement on this issue what this:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com wrote:
Initially irqchip was discussed, but we also have a DMA crossbar
to map the dma-requests. Since both irq/dma crossbars should be handled,
pinctrl was suggested as the appropriate place to handle this.
I think it is
On Thursday 15 August 2013 04:01 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com wrote:
Initially irqchip was discussed, but we also have a DMA crossbar
to map the dma-requests. Since both irq/dma crossbars should be handled,
pinctrl was suggested
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 August 2013 04:01 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com wrote:
Initially irqchip was discussed, but we also have a DMA crossbar
to map the
On Thursday 15 August 2013 04:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 15 August 2013 04:01 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com wrote:
Initially irqchip
* Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com [130813 06:35]:
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 04:10 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com [130724 12:06]:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 02:51 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013 01:43 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On
* Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com [130724 12:06]:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 02:51 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013 01:43 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 10:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013 11:38 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 24 July
Hi Tony,
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 01:40 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com [130724 12:06]:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 02:51 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013 01:43 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 10:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 04:10 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com [130724 12:06]:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 02:51 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013 01:43 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 10:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 05:56 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Tuesday 13 August 2013 01:40 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com [130724 12:06]:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 02:51 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013 01:43 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On
On 07/22/2013 11:23 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
To summaries it again, what I understood from Sricharan's proposal,
- Setup all the routing at cross-bar probe so that kernel continue to
work like normal IRQ controller with cross-bar scope vanishes once
the routing is done. Cross-bar does this
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 12:08 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/22/2013 11:23 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
To summaries it again, what I understood from Sricharan's proposal,
- Setup all the routing at cross-bar probe so that kernel continue to
work like normal IRQ controller with cross-bar
On 07/24/2013 11:38 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 12:08 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
That said, maybe a intermediate pinctrl approach might be more pragmatic and
less theoretically flexible.
an option might be to statically allocate default number of interrupts to a
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 10:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013 11:38 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 12:08 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
That said, maybe a intermediate pinctrl approach might be more pragmatic
and less theoretically flexible.
an option might be
On 07/24/2013 01:43 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 10:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013 11:38 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 12:08 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
That said, maybe a intermediate pinctrl approach might be more pragmatic and
less
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 02:51 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013 01:43 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 10:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/24/2013 11:38 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 24 July 2013 12:08 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
That said, maybe a
Hi Linus,
On Sunday 21 July 2013 10:19 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
I carry forward my TI internal objection to this approach:
It is actually a very good sign of FOSS-maturity that you as a company
take unresolved architectural
On Monday 22 July 2013 08:20 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Linus,
On Sunday 21 July 2013 10:19 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
I carry forward my TI internal objection to this approach:
It is actually a very good sign of FOSS-maturity
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
The Peripheral irq/dma requests are connected to one crossbar's input
and the output of the crossbar is connected to controller's input
line. On POR, there are some mappings which are done by default.
Those peripherals which do
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
I carry forward my TI internal objection to this approach:
It is actually a very good sign of FOSS-maturity that you as a company
take unresolved architectural issues to the community. Kudos!
Lets see what happens as a result
On Thursday 18 July 2013 02:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Since the cross-bar is not limited t0 IRQ lines and applicable for
DMA request lines as well, making it IRQ chip doesn't make sense. Its
not typical pin control functionality either but at least that framework
is much closer to
On Friday 19 July 2013 12:47 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
On Thursday 18 July 2013 02:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Since the cross-bar is not limited t0 IRQ lines and applicable for
DMA request lines as well, making it IRQ chip doesn't make sense. Its
not typical pin control functionality either
Hi,
On Friday 19 July 2013 05:43 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 18 July 2013 02:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/18/2013 11:43 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Some socs have a large number of interrupts/dma
Some socs have a large number of interrupts/dma requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the
requests lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
time, so they have to be muxed to the controllers appropriately.
In such places a interrupt/dma controllers
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 22:13 +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
Some socs have a large number of interrupts/dma requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the
requests lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
time, so they have to be muxed to the controllers
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:13:48PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
Some socs have a large number of interrupts/dma requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the
requests lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
time, so they have to be muxed to the
On 07/18/2013 11:43 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Some socs have a large number of interrupts/dma requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the
requests lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
time, so they have to be muxed to the controllers
On Thursday 18 July 2013 02:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/18/2013 11:43 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Some socs have a large number of interrupts/dma requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the
requests lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
santosh.shilim...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 18 July 2013 02:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 07/18/2013 11:43 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
Some socs have a large number of interrupts/dma requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and
41 matches
Mail list logo
