These comments should now be fixed in the new version I just sent out.
-Tero
-Original Message-
From: Högander Jouni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 September, 2008 16:47
To: ext Paul Walmsley
Cc: Kristo Tero (Nokia-D/Tampere); linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM
Hello Tero, Jouni,
so is this basically a workaround patch?
a few comments:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Tero Kristo wrote:
From: ext Jouni Hogander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In omap3 gpios 2-6 are in per domain. Functional clocks for these
should be disabled.
GPIO modules in PER domain are not able
ext Paul Walmsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Tero, Jouni,
so is this basically a workaround patch?
Yes in new format. Please do not use word workaround;)
a few comments:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Tero Kristo wrote:
From: ext Jouni Hogander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In omap3 gpios 2-6 are in
From: ext Jouni Hogander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In omap3 gpios 2-6 are in per domain. Functional clocks for these
should be disabled.
GPIO modules in PER domain are not able to act as a wake up source if
PER domain is in retention. PER domain sleep transition before MPU is
prevented by leaving icks