Re: [PATCH 1/5] watchdog: sync linux-omap changes

2008-09-19 Thread Wim Van Sebroeck
Hi Balbi, And thanks for the review. I'll fix your comments and resend the series ;-) Thanks because I had the same objections then Russell. Greetings, Wim. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo

[PATCH 1/5] watchdog: sync linux-omap changes

2008-09-19 Thread Felipe Balbi
These are changes that have been sitting in linux-omap and were never sent upstream. Hopefully, it'll never happen again at least for this driver. Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/arm/plat-omap/devices.c | 21 ++-- drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c | 287

Re: [PATCH 1/5] watchdog: sync linux-omap changes

2008-09-19 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
You're getting there with this patch, but still not completely up to snuff. On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:32:35PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c index 3a11dad..e55f2cc 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c +++

Re: [PATCH 1/5] watchdog: sync linux-omap changes

2008-09-19 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 19 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote: - * linux/drivers/char/watchdog/omap_wdt.c + * linux/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c current style omits the paths (just use omap_wdt.c) since they change periodically... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in the

Re: [PATCH 1/5] watchdog: sync linux-omap changes

2008-09-19 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 19 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote: +static struct platform_device *omap_wdt_dev; +  ... +struct omap_wdt_dev { +   void __iomem    *base;          /* physical */ +   struct device   *dev; You don't need both omap_wdt_dev (platform device) and omap_wdt_dev.dev (hmm,

Re: [PATCH 1/5] watchdog: sync linux-omap changes

2008-09-18 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:23:38AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: From: Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] These are changes that have been sitting in linux-omap and were never sent upstream. Hopefully, it'll never happen again at least for this driver. Great, thanks for looking at this.

Re: [PATCH 1/5] watchdog: sync linux-omap changes

2008-09-18 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:05:29AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:23:38AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: From: Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] These are changes that have been sitting in linux-omap and were never sent upstream. Hopefully, it'll never

Re: [PATCH 1/5] watchdog: sync linux-omap changes

2008-09-18 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 02:11:20AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:05:29AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:23:38AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: From: Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] These are changes that have been sitting in