Hi Tomi,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 11:01 +0530, K, Mythri P wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:39 +0530, mythr...@ti.com wrote:
-static int
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 11:01 +0530, K, Mythri P wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:39 +0530, mythr...@ti.com wrote:
-static int get_timings_index(void)
+static bool hdmi_find_code(const struct hdmi_config
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:39 +0530, mythr...@ti.com wrote:
From: Mythri P K mythr...@ti.com
Change the timing match logic, Instead of the statically mapped method
to get the corresponding timings for a given code and
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 18:39 +0530, mythr...@ti.com wrote:
From: Mythri P K mythr...@ti.com
Change the timing match logic, Instead of the statically mapped method
to get the corresponding timings for a given code and mode, move to a
simpler array indexed method. It will help to scale up to
From: Mythri P K mythr...@ti.com
Change the timing match logic, Instead of the statically mapped method
to get the corresponding timings for a given code and mode, move to a
simpler array indexed method. It will help to scale up to add more
timings when needed.
Signed-off-by: Mythri P K
