Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/17/2010 04:54 PM, the following:
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/16/2010 12:57 PM, the following:
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Nishanth Menon had written, on 12/15/2010 06:05 PM, the
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/16/2010 12:57 PM, the following:
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Nishanth Menon had written, on 12/15/2010 06:05 PM, the following:
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/15/2010 05:47 PM, the following:
I agree that this
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/17/2010 04:54 PM, the following:
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/16/2010 12:57 PM, the following:
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Nishanth Menon had written, on 12/15/2010 06:05 PM, the following:
Kevin Hilman had
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Nishanth Menon had written, on 12/15/2010 06:05 PM, the following:
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/15/2010 05:47 PM, the following:
I agree that this additional check in sram_idle should be removed, but
as long as I handle it in omap3_pm_off_mode_enable
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/16/2010 12:57 PM, the following:
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Nishanth Menon had written, on 12/15/2010 06:05 PM, the following:
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/15/2010 05:47 PM, the following:
I agree that this additional check in sram_idle should be
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/13/2010 09:42 PM, the following:
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Vishwanath Sripathy had written, on 12/13/2010 08:58 AM, the following:
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-
omap2/pm34xx.c
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/15/2010 05:47 PM, the following:
I agree that this additional check in sram_idle should be removed, but
as long as I handle it in omap3_pm_off_mode_enable where the next
states are configured, is'nt that enough or am I missing something?
Setting the next states
Nishanth Menon had written, on 12/15/2010 06:05 PM, the following:
Kevin Hilman had written, on 12/15/2010 05:47 PM, the following:
I agree that this additional check in sram_idle should be removed, but
as long as I handle it in omap3_pm_off_mode_enable where the next
states are configured,
] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable coreoff if
ES1.2
From: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@nokia.com
Limitation i583: Self_Refresh Exit issue after OFF mode
Issue:
When device is waking up from OFF mode, then SDRC state machine
sends
inappropriate sequence violating JEDEC standards
; Kevin Hilman; Tony Lindgren; Nishanth Menon
Subject: [PATCH 5/5 v3] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable coreoff if
ES1.2
From: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@nokia.com
Limitation i583: Self_Refresh Exit issue after OFF mode
Issue:
When device is waking up from OFF mode, then SDRC state
Nishant,
-Original Message-
From: Nishanth Menon [mailto:n...@ti.com]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 7:13 PM
To: Vishwanath Sripathy
Cc: linux-omap; Eduardo Valentin; Kevin Hilman; Tony Lindgren
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v3] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable
coreoff if ES1.2
: [PATCH 5/5 v3] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable
coreoff if ES1.2
Vishwanath Sripathy had written, on 12/13/2010 07:35 AM, the
following:
Nishant,
-Original Message-
From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Nishanth Menon
Sent: Friday
Nishant,
-Original Message-
From: Nishanth Menon [mailto:n...@ti.com]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 7:35 PM
To: Vishwanath Sripathy
Cc: linux-omap; Eduardo Valentin; Kevin Hilman; Tony Lindgren
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v3] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable
coreoff if ES1.2
Vishwanath Sripathy had written, on 12/13/2010 08:25 AM, the following:
[...]
+ if (IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM(SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583)
+ (core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
{
+ pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(core_pwrdm,
PWRDM_POWER_RET);
+
-Original Message-
Vishwanath Sripathy had written, on 12/13/2010 08:25 AM, the following:
[...]
+ if (IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM(SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583)
+ (core_next_state == PWRDM_POWER_OFF))
{
+ pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(core_pwrdm,
Vishwanath Sripathy had written, on 12/13/2010 08:45 AM, the following:
Keep in mind - if we disable it in omap3_pm_off_mode_enable - we will
deny OFF wholesale if I understand the logic right- not just core-off -
I kind of think that is extreme.
No, I am not saying that deny idle for all
-Original Message-
From: Nishanth Menon [mailto:n...@ti.com]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 8:14 PM
To: Vishwanath Sripathy
Cc: linux-omap; Eduardo Valentin; Kevin Hilman; Tony Lindgren
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/5 v3] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable
coreoff if ES1.2
Nishant,
-Original Message-
From: Nishanth Menon [mailto:n...@ti.com]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 8:07 PM
To: Vishwanath Sripathy
Cc: linux-omap; Eduardo Valentin; Kevin Hilman; Tony Lindgren
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v3] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable
coreoff if ES1.2
] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable
coreoff if ES1.2
-Original Message-
Vishwanath Sripathy had written, on 12/13/2010 08:25 AM, the
following:
[...]
+ if
(IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM(SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583)
+ (core_next_state ==
PWRDM_POWER_OFF
-Original Message-
From: Nishanth Menon [mailto:n...@ti.com]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 8:23 PM
To: Vishwanath Sripathy
Cc: linux-omap; Eduardo Valentin; Kevin Hilman; Tony Lindgren
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v3] OMAP3630: PM: Erratum i583: disable
coreoff if ES1.2
Vishwanath
Vishwanath Sripathy had written, on 12/13/2010 08:58 AM, the following:
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-
omap2/pm34xx.c
index ba3c0d6..da12a56 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@ -932,8 +932,15 @@ void
Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com writes:
Vishwanath Sripathy had written, on 12/13/2010 08:58 AM, the following:
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-
omap2/pm34xx.c
index ba3c0d6..da12a56 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
@@
From: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@nokia.com
Limitation i583: Self_Refresh Exit issue after OFF mode
Issue:
When device is waking up from OFF mode, then SDRC state machine sends
inappropriate sequence violating JEDEC standards.
Impact:
OMAP3630 ES1.2 is impacted as follows depending on
23 matches
Mail list logo
