On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:22 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
calculations. So, DISPC_CORE_CLK replaces as functional clock of DISPC.
DISPC_CORE_CLK is derived from DISPC_FCLK divided by an independent DISPC
divisor LCD.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:22 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
calculations. So, DISPC_CORE_CLK replaces as functional clock of DISPC.
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 16:44 +0530, Mahapatra, Chandrabhanu wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Tomi Valkeinen tomi.valkei...@ti.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:22 +0530, Chandrabhanu Mahapatra wrote:
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
DISPC_FCLK is incorrectly used as functional clock of DISPC in scaling
calculations. So, DISPC_CORE_CLK replaces as functional clock of DISPC.
DISPC_CORE_CLK is derived from DISPC_FCLK divided by an independent DISPC
divisor LCD.
Signed-off-by: Chandrabhanu Mahapatra cmahapa...@ti.com
---