On 29.12.2015 09:46, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
Oh, I'm sorry, I must have forgotten about that. Please, send a new patch.
Tomi
Actually it is me to be sorry for making noise, I've missed
0eb0dafb674cd6bfac2e3204b2f8b907e26b1138 with all those patches moving
files around.
Ivo
--
To
On 25/12/15 15:29, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>
> Hi Tomi,
>
> On 13.01.2014 12:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 2014-01-11 11:39, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
>>
>>> The patch does not apply cleanly on top of rc7, however I applied it by
>>> hand. So far it seems it fixes the issue brought by
>>>
Hi Tomi,
On 13.01.2014 12:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2014-01-11 11:39, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
The patch does not apply cleanly on top of rc7, however I applied it by
hand. So far it seems it fixes the issue brought by
c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168, though I didn't test if
On 2014-01-11 11:39, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
The patch does not apply cleanly on top of rc7, however I applied it by
hand. So far it seems it fixes the issue brought by
c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168, though I didn't test if
mutex_lock/mutex_unlock are complementary in every code
On 10.01.2014 12:56, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 2014-01-05 15:13, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov freemangor...@abv.bg
Commit c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 fixes the unbalanced
unlock in acx565akm_enable but introduces another problem - if
acx565akm_panel_power_on exits
On 2014-01-05 15:13, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov freemangor...@abv.bg
Commit c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 fixes the unbalanced
unlock in acx565akm_enable but introduces another problem - if
acx565akm_panel_power_on exits early, the mutex is not unlocked. Fix
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov freemangor...@abv.bg
Commit c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 fixes the unbalanced
unlock in acx565akm_enable but introduces another problem - if
acx565akm_panel_power_on exits early, the mutex is not unlocked. Fix
that by unlocking the mutex on early return. Also add
