Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mtd: omap: nand: Remove 0xFF's that prefixed 16bit NAND commands

2012-10-26 Thread Christopher Harvey
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 01:42:52PM -0400, Christopher Harvey wrote: In 16bit NAND mode the GPMC would send the command 0xNN as 0xFFNN instead of 0x00NN on the bus. The 0xFFs were actually uninitialized bits that were left unset in the GPMC command output register. The reason they weren't

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mtd: omap: nand: Remove 0xFF's that prefixed 16bit NAND commands

2012-10-26 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Christopher Harvey char...@matrox.com [121026 07:47]: On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 01:42:52PM -0400, Christopher Harvey wrote: --- drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 14 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Ping? Looks like you should cc also the MTD list to get more

[PATCH v2 1/1] mtd: omap: nand: Remove 0xFF's that prefixed 16bit NAND commands

2012-10-19 Thread Christopher Harvey
In 16bit NAND mode the GPMC would send the command 0xNN as 0xFFNN instead of 0x00NN on the bus. The 0xFFs were actually uninitialized bits that were left unset in the GPMC command output register. The reason they weren't initialized in 16bit mode is that if the same code that writes to this