On 12/04/2015 02:54 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> * Peter Ujfalusi [151016 00:23]:
>
> I noticed something while changing dm81xx to use the edma_xbar..
>
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>> +
>> +
Hi Peter,
* Peter Ujfalusi [151016 00:23]:
I noticed something while changing dm81xx to use the edma_xbar..
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> +
> + edma_xbar: dma-router@44e10f90 {
> + compatible
On 11/04/2015 10:37 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:46:05PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> Okay I have reverted the two and applied the edma patch sent, can you please
>>> verify topic/edma_fix before I merge it and send my PULL request.
>>
>> The branch looks good. Thank you!
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:46:05PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > Okay I have reverted the two and applied the edma patch sent, can you please
> > verify topic/edma_fix before I merge it and send my PULL request.
>
> The branch looks good. Thank you!
> It would have been great if the DTS
Vinod,
On 11/02/2015 05:40 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:13:01PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Vinod,
>>
>> On 11/02/2015 12:04 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:21:19AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
1) This seems to have broken BBB in
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:13:01PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Vinod,
>
> On 11/02/2015 12:04 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:21:19AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> 1) This seems to have broken BBB in -next for me, bisected down to this
> >> patch.
> >>
>
Hi,
1) This seems to have broken BBB in -next for me, bisected down to this patch.
For bootlog:
http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20151102/bbb-arm-omap2plus_defconfig.html
2) Please avoid merging DT/platform code in your driver tree, Vinod,
at least without an ack from the platform
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:21:19AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1) This seems to have broken BBB in -next for me, bisected down to this patch.
>
> For bootlog:
> http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20151102/bbb-arm-omap2plus_defconfig.html
>
> 2) Please avoid merging
Hi Olof,
On 11/02/2015 11:21 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1) This seems to have broken BBB in -next for me, bisected down to this patch.
>
> For bootlog:
> http://arm-soc.lixom.net/bootlogs/next/next-20151102/bbb-arm-omap2plus_defconfig.html
Aargh, I had the patch which should have been
Vinod,
On 11/02/2015 12:04 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:21:19AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 1) This seems to have broken BBB in -next for me, bisected down to this
>> patch.
>>
>> For bootlog:
>>
Switch to use the ti,edma3-tpcc and ti,edma3-tptc binding for the eDMA3 and
enable the DMA even crossbar with ti,am335x-edma-crossbar.
With the new bindings boards can customize and tweak the DMA channel
priority to match their needs. With the new binding the memcpy is safe
to be used since with
11 matches
Mail list logo