* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [110202 04:10]:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:12:38AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
On
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:12:38AM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
I'll do a quick respin of the patches with that and the
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:38:59PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:20:13 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
It's a little irritating having two hwspinlock.h's.
On Monday 31 January 2011, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
Add a platform-independent hwspinlock framework.
Hardware spinlock devices are needed, e.g., in order to access data
that is shared between remote processors, that otherwise have no
alternative mechanism to accomplish synchronization and
Add a platform-independent hwspinlock framework.
Hardware spinlock devices are needed, e.g., in order to access data
that is shared between remote processors, that otherwise have no
alternative mechanism to accomplish synchronization and mutual exclusion
operations.
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:33:41 +0200
Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
Add a platform-independent hwspinlock framework.
Hardware spinlock devices are needed, e.g., in order to access data
that is shared between remote processors, that otherwise have no
alternative mechanism to accomplish
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
It's a little irritating having two hwspinlock.h's.
hwspinlock_internal.h wold be a conventional approach. But it's not a
big deal.
...
+/**
+ * __hwspin_lock_timeout() - lock an hwspinlock with timeout limit
+
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:20:13 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
It's a little irritating having two hwspinlock.h's.
hwspinlock_internal.h wold be a conventional approach. __But it's not a
big deal.
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
I'll do a quick respin of the patches with that and the
hwspinlock_internal.h comment above.
OK..
The patch series looks OK to me.
Can I add your Acked-by on the non-omap parts when I respin the series ?
Thanks,
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:36:22 +0200 Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
I'll do a quick respin of the patches with that and the
hwspinlock_internal.h comment above.
OK..
The patch series looks OK to me.
11 matches
Mail list logo