On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 04:04:23PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
While the original clk_hw suggestion was well intentioned, it just
forces too many unnecessary dereferences and indirection. It also
prevents static init of some fields as others have mentioned.
Overall, it made the MSM clock
On 12/17/2011 03:04 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Thomas Gleixnert...@linutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Mike Turquette wrote:
+void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Saravana Kannan skan...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 12/17/2011 03:04 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Thomas Gleixnert...@linutronix.de
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec
On 01/13/2012 08:39 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Saravana Kannanskan...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 12/17/2011 03:04 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Thomas
On 12 Jan 04, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/04/2012 07:01 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/03/2012 08:15 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16,
On 01/04/2012 08:07 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Rob Herringrobherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/04/2012 07:01 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Rob Herringrobherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/03/2012 08:15 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Fri,
On 01/12/2012 06:04 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
On 01/04/2012 08:07 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Rob Herringrobherri...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 01/04/2012 07:01 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Rob Herringrobherri...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
On 01/12/2012 04:48 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On 01/12/2012 06:04 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
On 01/04/2012 08:07 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Rob Herringrobherri...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 01/04/2012 07:01 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Rob
On 01/03/2012 08:15 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Mike Turquette wrote:
snip
+/**
+ * clk_init - initialize the data structures in a
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/03/2012 08:15 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Mike Turquette
On 01/04/2012 07:01 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/03/2012 08:15 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/04/2012 07:01 PM, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/03/2012 08:15 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette, Mike
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Mike Turquette wrote:
+void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (!clk)
+ return;
+
+ if
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 04:45:48PM -0800, Turquette, Mike wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Mike Turquette wrote:
+void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (!clk)
+ return;
+
+ if
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Mike Turquette wrote:
+void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (!clk)
+ return;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(clk-prepare_count == 0))
+ return;
+
+ if
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Mike Turquette wrote:
+void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (!clk)
+ return;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(clk-prepare_count == 0))
+ return;
+
+ if (--clk-prepare_count 0)
+ return;
+
+ WARN_ON(clk-enable_count 0);
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Ryan Mallon rmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/12/11 14:53, Mike Turquette wrote:
+void __clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (!clk)
+ return;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(clk-prepare_count == 0))
+ return;
+
+ if
The common clk framework is an attempt to define a common struct clk
which can be used by most platforms, and an API that drivers can always
use safely for managing clks.
The net result is consolidation of many different struct clk definitions
and platform-specific clk framework implementations.
On 14/12/11 14:53, Mike Turquette wrote:
The common clk framework is an attempt to define a common struct clk
which can be used by most platforms, and an API that drivers can always
use safely for managing clks.
The net result is consolidation of many different struct clk definitions
and
Hi Mike,
+ *
+ * @recalc_rate Recalculate the rate of this clock, by quering hardware
+ * and/or the clock's parent. It is up to the caller to insure
+ * that the prepare_mutex is held across this call. Returns the
+ * calculated rate. Optional, but
20 matches
Mail list logo
