On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 10:08 PM, Eliad Peller wrote:
Now that we have wlcore device-tree bindings in place
(for both wl12xx and wl18xx), remove the legacy
wl12xx_platform_data struct, and move its members
into the
On Monday 23 March 2015 01:57 PM, Eliad Peller wrote:
I was applying the whole series, but over v4.0-rc1 :) Its best to
mention the baseline in cover-letter itself.
check out again the cover-letter. you probably overlooked it :)
I see it now :)
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this
+ Ido
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 10:08 PM, Eliad Peller wrote:
Now that we have wlcore device-tree bindings in place
(for both wl12xx and wl18xx), remove the legacy
wl12xx_platform_data struct, and move its members
into the platform device data (that is passed to wlcore)
Davinci 850 is the
hi Sekhar,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
+ Ido
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 10:08 PM, Eliad Peller wrote:
Now that we have wlcore device-tree bindings in place
(for both wl12xx and wl18xx), remove the legacy
wl12xx_platform_data struct, and move its
On Monday 23 March 2015 01:36 PM, Eliad Peller wrote:
hi Sekhar,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com wrote:
+ Ido
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 10:08 PM, Eliad Peller wrote:
Now that we have wlcore device-tree bindings in place
(for both wl12xx and wl18xx), remove the
Now that we have wlcore device-tree bindings in place
(for both wl12xx and wl18xx), remove the legacy
wl12xx_platform_data struct, and move its members
into the platform device data (that is passed to wlcore)
Davinci 850 is the only platform that still set
the platform data in the legacy way (and
