Hi Tony,
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 03:40:34, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Great, this all looks good to me. I suggest that on top of this
we add minimal devicetree binding that does not even attempt to
deal with the timings yet.
Then once the minimal devicetree binding is in place, we can
call the
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120911 03:54]:
Hi Tony,
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 03:40:34, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Great, this all looks good to me. I suggest that on top of this
we add minimal devicetree binding that does not even attempt to
deal with the timings yet.
Then once the
Hello,
Le 08/09/2012 00:10, Tony Lindgren a écrit :
* Afzal Mohammed af...@ti.com [120905 05:37]:
Hi,
Basic gpmc driver conversion series. Driver that is now created out of
gpmc code is a simple one, it handles tasks that were earlier executed
by gpmc_init. Now instead of relying on cpu_is_*
* Afzal Mohammed af...@ti.com [120905 05:37]:
Hi,
Basic gpmc driver conversion series. Driver that is now created out of
gpmc code is a simple one, it handles tasks that were earlier executed
by gpmc_init. Now instead of relying on cpu_is_* checks, it obtains
resources and clk handle in the
Hi,
Basic gpmc driver conversion series. Driver that is now created out of
gpmc code is a simple one, it handles tasks that were earlier executed
by gpmc_init. Now instead of relying on cpu_is_* checks, it obtains
resources and clk handle in the standard Linux way. The existing gpmc
interface
