On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:42:31PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi,
Originally sent on Apr 14th, note that this series is blocking another 16
patches series, I would like it to be taken in 3.16 if we can agree on this
implementation.
A patch set as suggested by Thierry to make lookup
Hi Alexandre,
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Alexandre Belloni
alexandre.bell...@free-electrons.com wrote:
Hi,
Originally sent on Apr 14th, note that this series is blocking another 16
patches series, I would like it to be taken in 3.16 if we can agree on this
implementation.
A patch
Hi,
Originally sent on Apr 14th, note that this series is blocking another 16
patches series, I would like it to be taken in 3.16 if we can agree on this
implementation.
A patch set as suggested by Thierry to make lookup with the lookup table
instead of device tree behave more like when using
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:42:31PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi,
Originally sent on Apr 14th, note that this series is blocking another 16
patches series, I would like it to be taken in 3.16 if we can agree on this
implementation.
It's kind of late for 3.16 now, but it doesn't look
[ CCed Laurent Pinchart ]
The renesas and shmobile portions of this seem reasonable to me
and I have checked that there do not seem to be any conflicts
with changes I already have queued up for v3.16 (and v3.17).
I have CCed Laurent Pinchart as I believe he most recently
did work on the renesas
Hi Alexandre and Simon,
On Tuesday 20 May 2014 07:39:13 Simon Horman wrote:
[ CCed Laurent Pinchart ]
The renesas and shmobile portions of this seem reasonable to me
and I have checked that there do not seem to be any conflicts
with changes I already have queued up for v3.16 (and v3.17).
