On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com [101015 13:09]:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
If you want I can provide my working branch on top of .36-rc8
with
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com [101015 13:09]:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
If you want I can provide my working branch on top of .36-rc8
with next-staging merged. If I revert your patches, it works fine.
That could be
;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; andy.shevche...@gmail.com;
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/11] staging tidspbridge: iommu migration
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; andy.shevche...@gmail.com;
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/11] staging tidspbridge: iommu migration
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
Well, in my experience it's the other way around
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
Well, in my experience it's the other way around, the stress
test-cases don't catch the errors that happen on real
use-case scenarios, no matter how extensive they are. This is
a good example.
I am facing some
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
If you want I can provide my working branch on top of .36-rc8
with next-staging merged. If I revert your patches, it works fine.
That could be interested. Can you send me the link?
There you go:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Guzman Lugo
x0095...@ti.com wrote:
This set of patches remove the dspbridge
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Guzman Lugo
x0095...@ti.com wrote:
This set of patches remove the dspbridge custom mmu
implementation and
use iommu module instead.
I have tried this, it works for
;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; andy.shevche...@gmail.com;
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/11] staging tidspbridge: iommu migration
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Guzman Lugo
;
linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; andy.shevche...@gmail.com;
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/11] staging tidspbridge: iommu migration
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Guzman Lugo
x0095...@ti.com wrote:
This set of patches remove the dspbridge custom mmu
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Fernando Guzman Lugo x0095...@ti.com wrote:
This set of patches remove the dspbridge custom mmu
implementation and use iommu module instead.
I have tried this, it works for simple tests, but not real use-cases.
I applied all your iommu patches. How did you test
This set of patches remove the dspbridge custom mmu
implementation and use iommu module instead.
Version2:
- Comments from FUJITA Tomonori and previous patch
tidspbridge: add map support for big buffers
was removed and instead a patch to define
ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN in arm architecture will be
12 matches
Mail list logo
