Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-10-05 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Arnd Bergmann [151005 04:08]: > On Monday 05 October 2015 03:55:55 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Daniel Lezcano [151001 15:16]: > > > On 09/30/2015 04:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > >On Wednesday 30 September 2015 16:42:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > >>

Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-10-05 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 05 October 2015 04:13:41 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Arnd Bergmann [151005 04:08]: > > On Monday 05 October 2015 03:55:55 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Daniel Lezcano [151001 15:16]: > > > > On 09/30/2015 04:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > >On

Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-10-05 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 05 October 2015 03:55:55 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Daniel Lezcano [151001 15:16]: > > On 09/30/2015 04:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > >On Wednesday 30 September 2015 16:42:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > >> > > >>TEGRA folks: the tegra_read_persistent_clock()

Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-10-05 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Daniel Lezcano [151001 15:16]: > On 09/30/2015 04:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >On Wednesday 30 September 2015 16:42:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> > >>TEGRA folks: the tegra_read_persistent_clock() implementation apparently > >>predates the Tegra RTC driver and I

Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-09-30 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 29 September 2015 15:43:55 Felipe Balbi wrote: > > the following patches de-obfuscate arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c > and start moving code to drivers/clocksource. So far only counter32k > has been moved over. > > Note that we can't get rid of all the code (yet) because there are >

Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-09-30 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 30 September 2015 16:42:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > TEGRA folks: the tegra_read_persistent_clock() implementation apparently > predates the Tegra RTC driver and I wonder if they actually do the > right thing in combination. Could it be that the wall time forwards > twice as fast as

Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-09-30 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 30 September 2015 16:42:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > TEGRA folks: the tegra_read_persistent_clock() implementation apparently > > predates the Tegra RTC driver and I wonder if they actually do the > > right thing in

Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-09-30 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 30 September 2015 16:42:21 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > TEGRA folks: the tegra_read_persistent_clock() implementation apparently > > predates the Tegra RTC driver and I wonder if they actually do the > > right thing in

Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-09-30 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 30 September 2015 09:13:38 Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:22:46AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 September 2015 15:43:55 Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > > > the following patches de-obfuscate arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c > > > and start moving code to

Re: [RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-09-30 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:22:46AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 29 September 2015 15:43:55 Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > the following patches de-obfuscate arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c > > and start moving code to drivers/clocksource. So far only counter32k > > has been moved over. > >

[RFC/PATCH 00/11] arm: omap: counter32k rework

2015-09-29 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, the following patches de-obfuscate arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c and start moving code to drivers/clocksource. So far only counter32k has been moved over. Note that we can't get rid of all the code (yet) because there are still platforms relying to legacy boot and because of the strong