On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:27:18 +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagn...@jcrosoft.com wrote:
On 16:23 Fri 09 Nov , Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/09/2012 09:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
However, I think the process for an end-user needs to be as simple as
drop this .dts/.dtb file into
On 16:23 Fri 09 Nov , Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/09/2012 09:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
...
I do rather suspect this use-case is quite common. NVIDIA certainly has
a bunch of development boards with
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:38:18PM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:24 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
[snip]
My intention wasn't never to make overlays overly portable. My intention
was to make them in a way that
Hi David,
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:52:32AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 05:10 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
[snip]
Oh yes. In fact if one was to use a single kernel image for beagleboard
and beaglebone, for the cape to work for
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
Not good to rely on userspace kicking off dtc and compiling from source.
Some capes/expansion boards might have your root fs device, for example
there is an
Hi Grant,
On Nov 13, 2012, at 2:24 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
Not good to rely on userspace kicking off dtc and compiling from source.
Some capes/expansion
On 11/13/2012 12:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:52:32AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 05:10 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
[snip]
Oh yes. In fact if one was to use a single kernel image for beagleboard
and beaglebone, for the cape to work for both, it is
On 11/13/2012 01:09 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
...
1) We annotate the base tree with some extra label information for
nodes which overlays are likely to want to reference by phandle. e.g.
beaglebone_pic: interrupt-controller@X {
It seems to me that this capebus discussion is missing an important
point. The name capebus suggests that it is a bus, so there should be a
parent node to represent that bus. It should have a driver whose API
implements all of the system-interface functions a cape needs.
If you look at the way
On 11/13/2012 11:10 AM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
It seems to me that this capebus discussion is missing an important
point. The name capebus suggests that it is a bus, so there should be a
parent node to represent that bus. It should have a driver whose API
implements all of the system-interface
On 11/13/2012 8:29 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/13/2012 11:10 AM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
It seems to me that this capebus discussion is missing an important
point. The name capebus suggests that it is a bus, so there should be a
parent node to represent that bus. It should have a driver
Hi Mitch,
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:09 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
On 11/13/2012 8:29 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/13/2012 11:10 AM, Mitch Bradley wrote:
It seems to me that this capebus discussion is missing an important
point. The name capebus suggests that it is a bus, so there should be a
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:09:28AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi David,
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:25 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:52:32AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 05:10 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
[snip]
Oh yes. In fact if one was to use a
Op 10 nov. 2012, om 00:40 heeft Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca het
volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/09/2012 09:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
Op 5 nov. 2012, om 21:40 heeft Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca het
volgende geschreven:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
Device Tree Overlay
Hi Grant,
Sorry for the late comments, travelling...
On Nov 9, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture
Hi Grant,
On Nov 9, 2012, at 7:02 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Mitch Bradley w...@firmworks.com wrote:
On 11/6/2012 12:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
This proposal is very oriented at an overlay-based approach. I'm not
totally convinced that a pure overlay approach
Hi Grant,
On Nov 9, 2012, at 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Maybe some extra version match table can just be passed during the board
machine_init
Hi Grant,
On Nov 9, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
I hope I'm not too late to reply as I'm traveling.
On Nov 6, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:57 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/08/2012 07:26 PM, David Gibson wrote:
...
I also think graft will handle most of your use cases, although as I
said I don't fully understand the implications of some of them, so I
could be wrong. So, the actual insertion
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 10, 2012, at 1:23 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/09/2012 09:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
...
I do rather suspect this use-case is quite common. NVIDIA certainly has
a bunch of development boards
Hi Joel,
Again, sorry for the late reply due to travel.
On Nov 10, 2012, at 5:36 AM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Option C: U-Boot loads both the base and overlay FDT files, merges them,
Hi Rob.
On Nov 11, 2012, at 10:47 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
On 11/09/2012 10:28:59 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
I'm not actually opposed to it, but it needs to be
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Nov 9, 2012, at 10:33 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
On 11/09/2012 09:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there.
On 11/12/2012 04:23 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant,
Sorry for the late comments, travelling...
On Nov 9, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
...
*with the caveat that not all types of changes are a good idea and we
may disallow. For example, is changing properties in existing
On 11/12/2012 05:10 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 10, 2012, at 1:23 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/09/2012 09:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
...
I do rather suspect this use-case is quite
On 11/12/2012 05:50 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Rob.
On Nov 11, 2012, at 10:47 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
On 11/09/2012 10:28:59 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 12, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 04:23 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant,
Sorry for the late comments, travelling...
On Nov 9, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
...
*with the caveat that not all types of changes are a good idea and we
On 11/12/2012 10:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 12, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 04:23 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant,
Sorry for the late comments, travelling...
On Nov 9, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
...
*with the caveat
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 12, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 10:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 12, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 04:23 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant,
Sorry for the late comments, travelling...
On
On 11/12/2012 10:19 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 12, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 10:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 12, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 04:23 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant,
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 12, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 10:19 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 12, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 10:00 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 12, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Stephen Warren
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
Sorry for the late comments, travelling...
On Nov 9, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 04:40:15PM +0100, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi David,
[snip]
I think graft is basically a safer operation, particular if we're
doing this at runtime with userspace passing in these fdt fragments.
In fact I'd go so far as to say if you really need the full overlay
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:08:14PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:26 AM, David Gibson
da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
Summary points:
- Create an FDT overlay data format and usage model
- SHALL reliable resolve or validate of phandles between base and
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:42:37PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:26 AM, David Gibson
da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
(3) Resolving phandle references from the subtree to the main tree.
So, I think this can actually be avoided, at least in cases where what
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:36:26PM -0600, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Option C: U-Boot loads both the base and overlay FDT files, merges them,
and passes the resolved tree to the
Hi Grant,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
(2)
Also this discussed a while back but at some point is going to brought
up again- loading of dt fragment directly from EEPROM and merging at
run time. If we were to implement this in kernel, we would
On 11/12/2012 06:05 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:42:37PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
...
2) graft bundle
The base tree has something like this:
...
i2c@XXX {
...
cape-socket {
compatible =
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:22:07PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 06:05 PM, David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:42:37PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
...
2) graft bundle
The base tree has something like this:
...
i2c@XXX {
...
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:52:32AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/12/2012 05:10 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
[snip]
Oh yes. In fact if one was to use a single kernel image for beagleboard
and beaglebone, for the cape to work for both, it is required for it's
dtb to be compatible.
On 11/09/2012 10:28:59 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren
swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
I'm not actually opposed to it, but it needs to be done in an elegant
way. The DT data model already imposes
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
Hi,
* Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com [121105 13:42]:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
Jane is building custom BeagleBone expansion boards called 'capes'. She
can
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 12:32:09AM -0500, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
I hope I'm not too late to reply as I'm traveling.
On Nov 6, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Joanne has purchased one of Jane's capes and packaged it into a rugged
Hi David,
On Nov 9, 2012, at 3:26 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:40:30PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Mitch Bradley w...@firmworks.com wrote:
On 11/6/2012 12:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
This proposal is very oriented at an overlay-based approach. I'm not
totally convinced that a pure overlay approach (as in how dtc does
overlayed DT nodes) will be flexible
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Yes, the locking does need to be sorted out.
Perhaps come up with a dt-stress test tool/boot time validator?
I would like that. I've started
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Maybe some extra version match table can just be passed during the board
machine_init
of_platform_populate(NULL, omap_dt_match_table, NULL, NULL,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:26 AM, David Gibson
da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
Summary points:
- Create an FDT overlay data format and usage model
- SHALL reliable resolve or validate of phandles between base and
overlay trees
So, I'm not at all clear on what this proposed phandle
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Joel A Fernandes agnel.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
I hope I'm not too late to reply as I'm traveling.
On Nov 6, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Joanne has purchased one of Jane's capes and packaged it into a
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:26 AM, David Gibson
da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
(3) Resolving phandle references from the subtree to the main tree.
So, I think this can actually be avoided, at least in cases where what
physical connections are available to the expansion module is well
On 11/08/2012 07:26 PM, David Gibson wrote:
...
I also think graft will handle most of your use cases, although as I
said I don't fully understand the implications of some of them, so I
could be wrong. So, the actual insertion of the subtree is pretty
trivial to implement. phandles are the
On 11/08/2012 10:32 PM, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
...
Alternatively to hashing, reading David Gibson's paper I followed,
phandle is supposed to 'uniquely' identity node. I wonder why the node
name itself is not sufficient to uniquely identify. The code that does
the tree walking can then just
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
Here's one other requirement I'd like that I don't think I saw
explicitly mentioned in
On 11/08/2012 07:26 PM, David Gibson wrote:
...
So, let me take a stab at this from a more bottom-up approach, and see
if we meet in the middle somewhere. As I discussed in the other
thread with Daniel Mack, I can see two different operationso on the
fdt that might be useful in this context.
On 11/09/2012 09:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
...
I do rather suspect this use-case is quite common. NVIDIA certainly has
a bunch of development boards with pluggable
PMIC/audio/WiFi/display/..., and I believe there's
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/08/2012 07:26 PM, David Gibson wrote:
...
I also think graft will handle most of your use cases, although as I
said I don't fully understand the implications of some of them, so I
could be wrong. So, the
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
Here's one
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/09/2012 09:28 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
wrote:
...
I do rather suspect this use-case is quite common. NVIDIA certainly has
a bunch of
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 8:29 AM, David Gibson
da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 12:32:09AM -0500, Joel A Fernandes wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
I hope I'm not too late to reply as I'm traveling.
On Nov 6, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com
Hi Pantelis,
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Option C: U-Boot loads both the base and overlay FDT files, merges them,
and passes the resolved tree to the kernel.
Could be made to work. Only really required if Joanne wants the
+ Peter
Hi Stephen,
On 11/7/2012 6:25 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/07/2012 03:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Hi Panto,
On 11/07/2012 09:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
Op 7 nov. 2012, om 23:35 heeft Ryan Mallon rmal...@gmail.com het volgende
geschreven:
On 06/11/12 08:40, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
Jane is building custom BeagleBone expansion boards called 'capes'. She
can
Koen Kooi wrote:
And as Pantelis mentioned before, I really don't want my users to change the
bootloader whenever they add a new LED.
Well, U-Boot does allow you to manipulate the device tree from the
command-line, but I understand that this feature doesn't work that well.
--
Timur Tabi
On 11/8/2012 3:28 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 7 nov. 2012, om 23:35 heeft Ryan Mallon rmal...@gmail.com het volgende
geschreven:
On 06/11/12 08:40, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
Jane is building custom BeagleBone
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:40:30PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
Device Tree Overlay Feature
Hrm. So, you may yet
Hi Pantelis,
I hope I'm not too late to reply as I'm traveling.
On Nov 6, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Joanne has purchased one of Jane's capes and packaged it into a rugged
case for data logging. As far as Joanne is concerned, the BeagleBone and
Hi Grant,
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 6, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
For
Hi Grant
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
[ snip ]
g.
Since we've started talking about longer term goals, and the versioning
provision seems to stand, I hope we address how much the
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
Hi Panto,
On 11/07/2012 09:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
[ snip ]
g.
Since we've started talking about longer term goals, and the
Hi Benoit,
On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Hi Panto,
On 11/07/2012 09:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
[ snip ]
g.
On 11/07/2012 12:02 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Benoit,
On Nov 7, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Hi Panto,
On 11/07/2012 09:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Benoit,
On Nov 7, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
On 11/07/2012 12:02 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Benoit,
[snip]
I don't know if this breaks any conventions but seems to work fine for our
case.
Yeah, my main concern with that approach is that you change the
structure
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 09:06 +0100, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 6, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30
On 11/07/2012 01:47 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there.
On 11/07/2012 03:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Hi Panto,
On 11/07/2012 09:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
[ snip ]
g.
Since we've started
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 7, 2012, at 6:18 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/07/2012 01:47 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture
Hi Stephen,
On Nov 7, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/07/2012 03:19 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Hi Panto,
On 11/07/2012 09:13 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Grant
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
On 06/11/12 08:40, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
Jane is building custom BeagleBone expansion boards called 'capes'. She
can boot the system with a stock BeagleBoard device tree, but additional
data is needed before a
Hi Grant,
On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
Device Tree Overlay Feature
Purpose
===
Sometimes
Hi Timur,
On Nov 5, 2012, at 10:40 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
Jane is building custom BeagleBone expansion boards called 'capes'. She
can boot the system with a stock BeagleBoard device tree, but additional
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
* Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca [121106 03:16]:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Another can of worms is the pinctrl nodes.
Yes... new pinctrl data would need to trigger adding new data to
pinctrl. I don't know if the
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca [121106 03:16]:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Another can of worms is the pinctrl nodes.
Yes... new pinctrl data would
Hi Grant,
On Nov 6, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Nov 5, 2012, at 9:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
Hi Russ,
On Nov 6, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Russ Dill wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca [121106 03:16]:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
Another can of
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
On Nov 6, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pa...@antoniou-consulting.com wrote:
For hot-plugging, you need it. Whether kernel code can deal with
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
The back of a napkin calculation indicates that on this platform
/proc/devicetree costs 76kB and /sys/device-tree costs 60kb. I'm happy
to see that using /sys instead of /proc appears to be slightly cheaper
which
On 11/06/2012 12:41 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Russ,
On Nov 6, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Russ Dill wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca [121106 03:16]:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
Interesting. This just came up internally at NVIDIA within the last
couple
On 11/6/2012 12:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 11/05/2012 01:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
Interesting. This just came
Hey folks,
As promised, here is my early draft to try and capture what device
tree overlays need to do and how to get there. Comments and
suggestions greatly appreciated.
Device Tree Overlay Feature
Purpose
===
Sometimes it is not convenient to describe an entire system with a
single FDT.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
Jane is building custom BeagleBone expansion boards called 'capes'. She
can boot the system with a stock BeagleBoard device tree, but additional
data is needed before a cape can be used. She could replace the FDT
Hi,
* Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com [121105 13:42]:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
Jane is building custom BeagleBone expansion boards called 'capes'. She
can boot the system with a stock BeagleBoard device tree, but additional
Tabi Timur-B04825 b04...@freescale.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Grant Likely
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
Jane is building custom BeagleBone expansion boards called 'capes'.
She
can boot the system with a stock BeagleBoard device tree, but
additional
data is needed before
98 matches
Mail list logo
