Hi,
I do post a patch to add the support to specify a virt and phys
address to the generic allocator so the pv-pool.c is not needed
we can just use the generic fucntion
I'll post a v3 updated again it
Best Regards,
J.
--- /dev/null +++
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 06:01:35PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
Hi,
I do post a patch to add the support to specify a virt and phys
address to the generic allocator so the pv-pool.c is not needed
we can just use the generic fucntion
You've talked about
On 17:18 Tue 19 Apr , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 06:01:35PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
Hi,
I do post a patch to add the support to specify a virt and phys
address to the generic allocator so the pv-pool.c is not needed
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:05:57PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
On 17:18 Tue 19 Apr , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 06:01:35PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
Hi,
I do post a patch to add the support to specify a
On 00:20 Wed 20 Apr , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 09:05:57PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
On 17:18 Tue 19 Apr , Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 06:01:35PM +0200, Jean-Christophe
PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
This is the second revision of this patch. I've not moved it out of
ARM yet as I haven't had a positive response from SH yet.
It's now called pv_pool (for phys/virt pool) rather than sram_pool,
and I've included MXC's iram support in this. Hopefully, if OMAP can
remove the FB stuff from SRAM we
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
This is the second revision of this patch. I've not moved it out of
ARM yet as I haven't had a positive response from SH yet.
It's now called pv_pool (for phys/virt pool) rather than sram_pool,
and I've
* Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk [110418 11:50]:
This is the second revision of this patch. I've not moved it out of
ARM yet as I haven't had a positive response from SH yet.
It's now called pv_pool (for phys/virt pool) rather than sram_pool,
and I've included MXC's iram
Hi Russell,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 14:22:59, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
This is the second revision of this patch. I've not moved it out of
ARM yet as I haven't had a positive response from SH yet.
I was able to test this on DaVinci (DA850 suspend-to-RAM) with
the following additional
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:42:10PM +0530, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
I was able to test this on DaVinci (DA850 suspend-to-RAM) with
the following additional changes:
There was a sram_free call remaining in pm.c file.
Hmm, wonder why my build for DaVinci didn't pick that up. Thanks for
that and
10 matches
Mail list logo
