On 2015/5/20 23:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
-static void locomo_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
+static void locomo_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
struct locomo *lchip = irq_desc_get_chip_data(desc);
+unsigned int irq;
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2015/5/20 23:28, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
-static void locomo_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
+static void locomo_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
struct locomo *lchip =
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
-static void locomo_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
+static void locomo_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
struct locomo *lchip = irq_desc_get_chip_data(desc);
+ unsigned int irq;
int req, i;
That leaves irq unitialized
On Wed, 20 May 2015, Jiang Liu wrote:
Now most IRQ flow handlers make no use of the first parameter 'irq'.
And for those who do make use of 'irq', we could easily get the irq
number through irq_desc-irq_data-irq. So kill the first parameter
'irq' of irq_flow_handler_t.
To ease review, I
Jiang Liu jiang@linux.intel.com writes:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/pcm990-baseboard.c
b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/pcm990-baseboard.c
index 2897da2a5df6..0d8331f8536e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/pcm990-baseboard.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/pcm990-baseboard.c
@@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ static
