On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:37:46PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 03:13-20150124, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On 09:39-20150123, Tyler Baker wrote:
[...]
I just reviewed the boot logs for next-20150123 and there still seems
to be a related issue. I've been boot testing
On 26 January 2015 at 04:00, Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:37:46PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 03:13-20150124, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On 09:39-20150123, Tyler Baker wrote:
[...]
I just reviewed the boot logs for next-20150123 and there
Hi,
On 23 January 2015 at 09:27, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
On 16:05-20150120, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[..]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
Just to close on this thread:
On 16:05-20150120, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[..]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
Just to close on this thread:
https://github.com/nmenon/kernel-test-logs/tree/next-20150123 looks good
and back to old status. Thank you
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:37:06PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 09:39-20150123, Tyler Baker wrote:
Hi,
On 23 January 2015 at 09:27, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
On 16:05-20150120, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[..]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov
On 09:39-20150123, Tyler Baker wrote:
Hi,
On 23 January 2015 at 09:27, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
On 16:05-20150120, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[..]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com
Just to close on this
On 22:22-20150123, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:37:06PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 09:39-20150123, Tyler Baker wrote:
Hi,
On 23 January 2015 at 09:27, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
On 16:05-20150120, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[..]
Hi Kirill,
On 23 January 2015 at 12:22, Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:37:06PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 09:39-20150123, Tyler Baker wrote:
Hi,
On 23 January 2015 at 09:27, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
On 16:05-20150120, Kirill A.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 02:42:17PM -0800, Tyler Baker wrote:
Hi Kirill,
On 23 January 2015 at 12:22, Kirill A. Shutemov kir...@shutemov.name wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 12:37:06PM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 09:39-20150123, Tyler Baker wrote:
Hi,
On 23 January 2015 at
On 03:13-20150124, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On 09:39-20150123, Tyler Baker wrote:
[...]
I just reviewed the boot logs for next-20150123 and there still seems
to be a related issue. I've been boot testing
multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y kernel configurations which still
2015-01-20 15:05 GMT+01:00 Kirill A. Shutemov kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com:
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Better option would be converting 2-lvl ARM configuration to
asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h, but I'm not sure if
On 01/20/2015 04:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Better option would be converting 2-lvl ARM configuration to
asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h, but I'm not sure if it's possible.
Well, IMHO the
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Better option would be converting 2-lvl ARM configuration to
asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h, but I'm not sure if it's possible.
Well, IMHO the folded approach in asm-generic was done the wrong way
which barred ARM from ever using
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Better option would be converting 2-lvl ARM configuration to
asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h, but I'm not sure if it's possible.
Well, IMHO the folded approach in asm-generic was done the wrong
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Better option would be converting 2-lvl ARM configuration to
asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h, but I'm
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:50:59PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Better option would be converting
On 16:05-20150120, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
Better option would be converting 2-lvl ARM configuration to
asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h, but I'm not sure if it's possible.
Well, IMHO the
Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:42:04AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Most platforms seem broken intoday's next tag.
https://github.com/nmenon/kernel-test-logs/tree/next-20150119
(defconfig: omap2plus_defconfig)
[7.166600] [ cut here
On 01/19/2015 10:59 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
I can confirm, I am observing the same issue in my lab. 15 platforms
failed to boot on next-20150119.
http://kernelci.org/boot/?next-20150119fail
http://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/next/kernel/next-20150119/
I see many platforms succeed in
On 19 January 2015 at 09:04, Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com wrote:
On 01/19/2015 10:59 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
I can confirm, I am observing the same issue in my lab. 15 platforms
failed to boot on next-20150119.
http://kernelci.org/boot/?next-20150119fail
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:42:04AM -0600, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Most platforms seem broken intoday's next tag.
https://github.com/nmenon/kernel-test-logs/tree/next-20150119
(defconfig: omap2plus_defconfig)
[7.166600] [ cut here ]
[7.171676] WARNING:
Hi,
Most platforms seem broken intoday's next tag.
https://github.com/nmenon/kernel-test-logs/tree/next-20150119
(defconfig: omap2plus_defconfig)
[7.166600] [ cut here ]
[7.171676] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 54 at mm/mmap.c:2859
exit_mmap+0x1a8/0x21c()
[
22 matches
Mail list logo
